The Bank of Japan – Ringing in the Endgame?

A great read from the author of "The Acting Man" blog. Ah, I remember Martinghoul telling me Abenomics appeared to be an "unmitigated success".
The Bank of Japan – Ringing in the Endgame?

January 30, 2016 | Author Pater Tenebrarum

Let’s Do More of What Doesn’t Work
It is the Keynesian mantra: the fact that the policies recommended by Keynesians and monetarists, i.e., deficit spending and money printing, routinely fail to bring about the desired results is not seen as proof that they simply don’t work. It is regarded as evidence that there hasn’t been enough spending and printing yet.



At the Bank of Japan this mantra has been gospel for as long as we can remember. Japan has always exhibited an especially strong penchant for central planning. We still recall that many Western observers were beginning to wonder in the late 1980s whether the Japanese form of state capitalism administered by the powerful Ministry of Trade and Industry and the BoJ wasn’t a superior economic system after all. Then this happened:


The Nikkei Index from 1989 to 2003. Japan’s seemingly never-ending boom coupled with forever rising stock prices, carefully administered by Tokyo’s powerful bureaucrats, suddenly became an intractable bust – click to enlarge.



This sudden change in fortunes should perhaps have been taken as a hint that central planning of the economy wasn’t such a good idea after all. That was not the conclusion of Japan’s movers and shakers though (or anyone else’s, for that matter). Instead it was decided that what was required were better planners, or at least a better plan.

For decades Japanese policymakers have been inundated with well-meaning advice by prominent Western economists. Even Ben Bernanke famously admonished them to just print more. According to Bernanke, holding interest rates at zero and implementing several iterations of QE were indicative of “policy paralysis” – after all, these efforts were obviously just not big and bold enough!

Going Big and Failing Again
After the reelection of Shinzo Abe and the installation of Haruhiko Kuroda as BoJ governor, the BoJ decided to simply continue doing what it has always done – more than 20 years of utter failure notwithstanding. However, in deference to the admonitions of the Bernankes and Krugmans of this world, it increased the size of its meddling by an order of magnitude:


Assets held by the Bank of Japan: since Kuroda has started this “QE on steroids” program in 2012, the central bank’s balance sheet has grown in parabolic fashion – click to enlarge.


In short, over the past four years the BoJ has thrown all remaining caution to the wind, with the declared goal of reviving Japan’s economy and creating an annual “inflation” rate of 2%. However, it seems now that even that was not enough just yet!

As an aside to this: no-one knows or can sensibly explain what lowering the purchasing power of one’s currency by exactly 2% p.a. is supposed to achieve. There exists neither theoretical nor empirical evidence that could possibly support the notion that it is a desirable goal. It is just another Keynesian mantra. Central bankers have basically pulled the 2% figure out of their hats.

The BoJ has certainly succeeded in devaluing the yen’s external value and impoverishing Japan’s citizens accordingly. It has also created a short term windfall for people buying Japanese stocks. To give you a rough idea how its “success” has manifested itself otherwise, here are a few charts illustrating the situation. The first one shows the quarterly annualized growth rate of Japan’s machinery orders (note the most recent figure, which has been released only last week):


The most recent data point of the BoJ-engineered “recovery”: machinery orders plunge by 14.4% – click to enlarge.


And here is the monthly growth rate in manufacturing production – a sector that due to its export prowess was supposed to be an especially great beneficiary of Kuroda’s destruction of the yen:

Japan’s manufacturing production, monthly annualized growth rate – the December data haven’t been released yet, but in light of last quarter’s machinery orders, production growth will likely be back in negative territory – click to enlarge.


In light of the enormous decline of the yen’s exchange rate since 2012, one would normally expect that the BoJ has at least succeeded in achieving its bizarre goal of raising the consumer price inflation rate to 2%. Well, it did – for exactly one month. However, that was mainly due to a hike in the sales tax, so it can actually not be attributed to the BoJ. Japan’s consumers have been very lucky so far – the planned assault on their wallets has turned out to be a complete dud as well:

Japan’s consumer price inflation rate, month-on-month. No dice, so far – click to enlarge.


The Time for More Insanity has Come
Stock markets around the world have recently swooned, with the Nikkei delivering an especially weak performance. After assuring everyone that the BoJ saw no need to add to its already enormous debt monetization program, Mr. Kuroda seems to have been convinced by recent market volatility that is was time to move on from an insane monetary policy to even more insane monetary policy. As Reuters reports:

“The Bank of Japan unexpectedly cut a benchmark interest rate below zero on Friday, stunning investors with another bold move to stimulate the economy as volatile markets and slowing global growth threaten its efforts to overcome deflation.

Global equities jumped, the yen tumbled and sovereign bonds rallied after the BOJ said it would charge for a portion of bank reserves parked with the institution, an aggressive policy pioneered by the European Central Bank (ECB).

“What’s important is to show people that the BOJ is strongly committed to achieving 2 percent inflation and that it will do whatever it takes to achieve it,” BOJ Governor Haruhiko Kuroda told a news conference after the decision.

(emphasis added)

Obviously, the BoJ cannot allow Draghi to get away with imposing policies that are even more crazy than its own. So it has now caught up with the lunatics running the monetary asylum in Europe. It is actually quite amusing that this admission of the complete failure of the policies implemented to date apparently caused stock markets to rally. JGB yields declined by more than 56% (!) on the day to a mere 10 basis points, and the yen got kneecapped, surrendering much of the gains it has achieved in recent weeks.


JGB yields plunge by 13 basis points to just 10 basis points – a loss of 56% in just one trading day – click to enlarge.



The yen is murdered, surrendering a large part of the gains it has made since early December – click to enlarge.


As to the BoJ’s commitment to “achieve inflation”, it may well end one day with price inflation going from zero to infinity in the space of a few months. Kuroda should be thankful that Japan’s citizens haven’t lost confidence in the currency yet in spite of his efforts; one of these days they will, and then it will probably be “game over” in a flash.

We should also point out that there is actually no deflation in Japan. There never has been and very likely, there never will be. Here is a chart of Japan’s narrow money supply M1, which consists of currency and demand deposits:


Japan’s narrow money supply M1 since the 1950s. What terrible, terrible deflation! – click to enlarge.


Reuters then unquestioningly parrots the official “reasoning” for why falling prices are allegedly “dangerous” (never mind that prices haven’t really fallen in Japan anyway – at best they were stable for a number of years) – readers are evidently supposed to just accept these unproven assertions as if it were perfectly obvious that they are true:

“In adopting negative interest rates Japan is reaching for a new weapon in its long battle against deflation, which since the 1990s have discouraged consumers from buying big because they expect prices to fall further. Deflation is seen as the root of two decades of economic malaise.”

This shows how utterly divorced from reality today’s mainstream economists and central bankers are – not to mention how lazy financial journalists are, who never seem to question this nonsense. The above assertion even flies into the face of economics 101. People buy less when prices decline? Since when? In what universe? Japanese consumers are allegedly waiting since the 1990s for “prices to fall further”? To call this utter bullsh*t feels almost like an insult to bullsh*t.

We guess the billions of people in the world who keep buying smart phones, computers, TV sets and all the other things that are continually falling in price in spite of the ministrations of central bankers must represent the “exception from the rule”.

Japan’s consumer price index has recently reached a new multi-decade high. Shouldn’t the central bank be glad that prices have actually been stable for so long? – click to enlarge.


In his press conference Kuroda uttered the following:

“Kuroda said the world’s third-biggest economy was recovering moderately and the underlying price trend was rising steadily.

“But there’s a risk recent further falls in oil prices, uncertainty over emerging economies, including China, and global market instability could hurt business confidence and delay the eradication of people’s deflationary mindset,” he said.

“The BOJ decided to adopt negative interest rates…to forestall such risks from materializing.”

Perhaps Kuroda should instead have pondered what risks are likely to materialize on account of the imposition of negative interest rates. We have already discussed this topic extensively in the context of the ECB’s decision to introduce negative rates, but here is a brief reminder:

Neither zero nor negative originary interest could possibly exist in an unhampered free market economy. Time preference cannot become zero or negative. Conceivably it could become zero if one were to fall into a black hole (it is theorized that no time passes there), or if scarcity were completely eliminated one day and no economic or technological progress would be seen as possible anymore. Neither of these hypothetical cases will ever be of practical importance.

Other than that, the only thing artificially imposed negative rates will achieve is to destroy what is left of the economy – they will slowly but surely transform prosperity into poverty. As Ludwig von Mises has warned:

“Not the impossible disappearance of originary interest, but the abolition of payment of interest to the owners of capital, would result in capital consumption. The capitalists would consume their capital goods and their capital precisely because there is originary interest and present want-satisfaction is preferred to later satisfaction.

Therefore there cannot be any question of abolishing interest by any institutions, laws, and devices of bank manipulation. He who wants to “abolish” interest will have to induce people to value an apple available in a hundred years no less than a present apple.

What can be abolished by laws and decrees is merely the right of the capitalists to receive interest. But such laws would bring about capital consumption and would very soon throw mankind back into the original state of natural poverty.”

As we have always said in these pages, the cunning plan of the mad hatters running the world’s central banks seems to consist of making people richer by making them poorer. One can safely assume that they haven’t really thought this one through.

Conclusion
It appears to us that the ever more desperate monetary policy measures adopted by the BoJ are coming closer and closer to crossing a point of no return. In other words, the BoJ seems to be entering what is popularly known as the “Keynesian endgame”. Once the threshold beyond which confidence is finally lost is crossed, the long maintained sophisticated fiat money Ponzi scheme and the associated three card Monte played between central banks, commercial banks and government treasuries will come to a screeching halt.

Naturally, we cannot tell you where this threshold precisely lies or how quickly said “endgame” will be playing out. Nor do we know with any precision what gyrations we may yet see as the situation evolves. We do however know that Kuroda’s decision has brought the world another step closer to the end. It would be a dangerous error to believe that such policies can be adopted without inviting severe consequences.

Kuroda is a member of a small coterie of central planners running the worlds currency systems, who are completely divorced from reality and are playing with the savings and lives of millions. They are implementing extremely risky experiments and evidently haven’t even the faintest inkling of what the ultimate outcome will be.

Unfortunately, none of us can do anything to stop them. It is therefore vitally important that one make a plan for oneself. It is quite ironic actually: the very people the economy depends on the most with respect to wealth creation are also most likely to be terrified by these developments. Consequently they are likely to withdraw more and more from genuine wealth creation activities. They will simply be far too busy trying to save themselves while it’s still possible.
 
The Fed has shown that aggressive and decisive action in monetary policy can get an economy out of a deflationary slump. The ECB and BOJ failed at that and as a result they continue with their policies of too little too late
 
The Fed has shown that aggressive and decisive action in monetary policy can get an economy out of a deflationary slump. The ECB and BOJ failed at that and as a result they continue with their policies of too little too late
no kidding, do it big or go home
 

In hindsight, Japan, the world's 3rd large economy, should have implemented this kind of scheme which is almost completely opposite to the recent conservative economic policy in the past 3+ decades.

Then they could have kept a certain growth of population, jobs, taxes, investment, etc. that they need, against the downturn of population, jobs, taxes, investment they have currently had for 3+ decades.

Countries like Japan and Switzerland, that have a constant shrink of population, mainly due to decreasing birth rate and lack of inflow immigrants, would have less and lesser jobs each year. They would have to close schools, paying high wages for lack of workers (hence high inflation), no more new houses required (Japan already has had a lot of abandon houses), no any new/major infrastructure projects/constructions required, decreasing income taxes, etc.

There would be only two ways to resolve the situation: New migrants; and Birth rate.

A forward looking country should accept more new migrants including asylum seekers that would generate a bit of vitality and competition dynamics.

This kind of new policy for an unconditional income given equally to everyone would be another constructive direction, producing positive impact to the national economy, even globally! Also reducing the natural conflict to the local citizens worrying about job competition! As the locals don't understand well, intellectually and intelligently, there is virtually Not enough jobs - if keeping the current trend of economic policies.

I could be wrong here but personally I can see the positive economic effects from both these two policies.

The expected growth of birth rate by the locals is a merely gambling. The inflow of new immigrants and asylum seekers is a 100% sure thing!

Perhaps the only problem would be about implementation and education, to let the locals understand their positive impacts and consequences.

Just 2 cents!
 
The Fed has shown that aggressive and decisive action in monetary policy can get an economy out of a deflationary slump. The ECB and BOJ failed at that and as a result they continue with their policies of too little too late[/QUOTE


correlation is not proof.
 
A simple mathematical model can prove that even the most economically prosperous and militarily powerful/ strong country/culture (e.g. Roman Empire, Babylon, etc.) could be disappeared if its birth rate is zero, and with only negative (i.e. a lot of outflow much greater than inflow) migrants!

Q A Sprawl of Ghost Homes in Aging Tokyo Suburbs

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/24/world/a-sprawl-of-abandoned-homes-in-tokyo-suburbs.html?_r=1

By JONATHAN SOBLE
AUG. 23, 2015


YOKOSUKA, Japan — Ever since her elderly neighbor moved a decade ago, Yoriko Haneda has done what she can to keep the empty house she left behind from becoming an eyesore. Ms. Haneda regularly trims its shrubs and clips its narrow strip of grass, maintaining its perfect view of the sea.

The volunteer yard work has not extended to the house two doors down, however. That one is vacant, too, and overgrown with bamboo. In fact, dozens of houses in this hillside neighborhood about an hour’s drive from Tokyo are abandoned.

“There are empty houses everywhere, places where nobody’s lived for 20 years, and more are cropping up all the time,” said Ms. Haneda, 77, complaining that thieves had broken into her neighbor’s house twice and that a typhoon had damaged the roof of the one next to it.


Despite a deeply rooted national aversion to waste, discarded homes are spreading across Japan like a blight in a garden. Long-term vacancy rates have climbed significantly higher than in the United States or Europe, and some eight million dwellings are now unoccupied, according to a government count. Nearly half of them have been forsaken completely — neither for sale nor for rent, they simply sit there, in varying states of disrepair.


These ghost homes are the most visible sign of human retreat in a country where the population peaked a half-decade ago and is forecast to fall by a third over the next 50 years. The demographic pressure has weighed on the Japanese economy, as a smaller work force struggles to support a growing proportion of the old, and has prompted intense debate over long-term proposals to boost immigration or encourage women to have more children.

For now, though, after decades in which it struggled with overcrowding, Japan is confronting the opposite problem: When a society shrinks, what should be done with the buildings it no longer needs?


Many of Japan’s vacant houses have been inherited by people who have no use for them and yet are unable to sell, because of a shortage of interested buyers. But demolishing them involves tactful questions about property rights, and about who should pay the costs. The government passed a law this year to promote demolition of the most dilapidated homes, but experts say the tide of newly emptied ones will be hard to stop.


“Tokyo could end up being surrounded by Detroits,” said Tomohiko Makino, a real estate expert who has studied the vacant-house phenomenon. Once limited mostly to remote rural communities, it is now spreading through regional cities and the suburbs of major metropolises. Even in the bustling capital, the ratio of unoccupied houses is rising.

Yokosuka is on the front lines. Within commuting distance of Tokyo and close to naval bases and automobile factories, it attracted thousands of young job-seekers in the era of roaring economic growth that followed World War II. Land was scarce and expensive, so the newcomers built small, simple homes wherever they could.

Today the boom is relentlessly reversing itself. The young workers of the postwar years are now retirees, and few people, their children included, want to take over their homes. “Their kids are in modern high-rises in central Tokyo,” Mr. Makino said. “To them, the family home is a burden, not an asset.”


Japan’s birthrate has been stuck below the level needed to maintain the population since the 1970s, as young people postpone marriage and many women put off having children as they enter the work force.

Photo
The front door that is covered by weeds of an abandoned house in the Yokosuka area. Credit Kentaro Takahashi for The New York Times

The city of Yokosuka is trying to change that, by encouraging owners of abandoned houses to tidy them up and put them on the market. It has established an online “vacant home bank” to showcase houses that commercial real estate agents will not touch. Land prices in Yokosuka are down by 70 percent since their peak at the end of the 1980s.

The houses are a steal for the rare souls who will have them. But just one has been sold through the home bank so far, a 60-year-old single-story wooden home with a patch of garden that was listed for 660,000 yen, or $5,400. Places farther up the hill can be had for the equivalent of just a few hundred dollars. Four have been rented, including one to students in a nursing-care program at a nearby college who receive a discount in return for checking up on elderly people in the area.

Other towns have tried their own creative solutions, including offering cash payments to outsiders who move in and buy unoccupied homes. A few have succeeded in attracting pockets of artists and freelance workers, who stay tethered by the Internet to their urban clients.

There is even a sprawling art project, the Echigo-Tsumari Art Field, which has taken unoccupied buildings in a cluster of towns northwest of Tokyo and turned them into contemporary artworks. Visitors can spend the night in a “Dream House” designed by the performance artist Marina Abramovic, with coffin-like beds and tinted lights designed to elicit dreams, or tour other buildings that have been intricately carved, painted or filled with sculptural installations.

“They may not be used for their original purpose anymore, but preserving them physically is important,” said the project’s founder, Fram Kitagawa. “The key is to preserve them in a positive way.”

Raw numbers suggest there is a limit to how many homes can be rescued through reuse, however. Japan’s population of 127 million is expected to drop by a million a year in the coming decades. Efforts to increase its low birthrate have been only modestly successful, and the public has shown no appetite for mass immigration. “We have too much infrastructure,” said Takashi Onishi, an urban planning professor and the president of the Science Council of Japan. The government, he believes, will eventually have to cut services like water and road and bridge maintenance in the most depopulated areas. “We can’t maintain it all. We’ll have to make those hard choices.”

The most blunt solution for abandoned houses is to tear them down before they become hazards or their neighborhoods earn an irreversible reputation for blight. But owners can be hard to track down, and are often reluctant to pay demolition costs.


The house that Ms. Haneda tends is owned by the family of Mioko Utagawa, 74, who lives a 10-minute walk down the hill. Ms. Utagawa’s husband bought it for an aunt in the 1970s after she divorced and moved here from Tokyo. Now she is in a nursing home. The family has been paying her modest property taxes but has otherwise left the house alone. The interior is a musty wreck; a small addition that once housed the bath has been ripped out, and the bathtub sits upturned on the faithfully manicured lawn.


“Even if we fixed it up nobody would want it,” Ms. Utagawa said.

The Utagawas recently agreed to have the house demolished, after the city offered to subsidize the estimated 3 million yen cost, under a municipal program introduced last year to deal with hazardous or hopelessly unsellable homes. It is scheduled for destruction this fall. Noriyuki Shima, the director of the city’s planning department, said cost considerations meant the city was targeting only the worst-affected neighborhoods.

“Giving public money to demolish a private house isn’t something we can do lightly,” he said.

The new national law, which came into effect in May, could help more municipalities cull their vacant houses. Among other changes, it removed a perverse incentive that has contributed to the problem. A tax break introduced decades ago to encourage home construction sets property tax rates on vacant lots at six times the level of those on built-up land. That means that if an owner demolishes a home, the tax rate soars — a big reason many let even crumbling houses stand.

Now the government can revoke the preferential tax treatment for houses whose absentee owners are letting them fall apart. But some critics say Japan needs a more fundamental shift in its approach to housing, which has long prioritized new construction over reuse.

Hidetaka Yoneyama, a housing specialist at the Fujitsu Research Institute, a think tank, said that until recently, homes in Japan were built to last only about 30 years, when they were then expected to be torn down and rebuilt. Building quality is improving, but the market for secondhand homes remains tiny. Developers are still building more than 800,000 new homes and condominiums a year, despite the glut of vacancies.

“In the high-growth era, everyone was happy with this arrangement,” Mr. Yoneyama said. But in 20 years, he calculated, more than one-quarter of Japanese houses could be empty. “Now the tables are turned. The population is declining and no one wants to live in these old houses.”
UQ
 
http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index.php?threads/ann-coulter-on-trump.296412/page-3#post-4218504

I saw a documentary recently about the following.

Without New migrants, the demand of new (additional/incremental) houses, cars, appliances, schools, teachers, hospitals, nurses, veges, fruits, movies, sports, etc, etc. could be gradually diminishing.

Perhaps some Smart countries like the US and Germany would need more New migrants, strategically!

Otherwise ...

Q http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...s-show-holes-in-abe-s-push-for-housing-growth

Ghost Towns

About 20 percent of residential areas in Japan will become ghost towns -- devoid of population -- by 2050, according to a land ministry forecast. Once an area reaches a tipping point of 20 percent home vacancy, it quickly turns into a ghost town as remaining residents flee seeking improved access to services and shops that inevitably close, Nomura Research’s Sakakibara said. Inariyato is about to reach it.

“The social impact of vacant homes is huge,” he said. “Local areas will lose their vitality as more and more homes become empty.”

In the U.K., just 2.3 percent of dwellings are vacant, according to the Department for Communities and Local Government in London, and 11 percent of homes in the U.S, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Just 2.6 percent of Japanese homes were vacant in 1963, according to the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.

Bath Distress

Yoshie Okada, 64, remembers those days. In Inariyato, Okada runs the public bath her grandfather acquired just after World War II. Sitting at a high-rise wooden counter in the middle of the separate bath entrances for men and women, collecting 450-yen fees, Okada said the number of bathers has halved in recent years.

“We don’t see many young people here,” said Okada, who looks two decades younger than her age, as beads of sweat ran down her neck in the heat. “We don’t know how long we can continue our business, as the majority of our visitors are elderly.”

The public bath, called Kame No Yu, which means bath for turtles, a symbol of longevity in Japanese culture, is one of two that are left in the area out of about five, she said.

Increasing Elderly

The number of elderly in this area of Yokosuka, on the other side of the train tracks from the U.S. Navy base, have more than doubled in the last three decades from 1983, while residents younger than 15 have dropped by half, according to a survey by Yokosuka’s city government in 2011. The city’s population has fallen 3.5 percent over the past two decades, according to its planning material. People 65 and older account for more than a quarter of Yokosuka’s population of 418,325, according to Statistics Bureau of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.

Businesses have closed. Saikaya Co., a 62-year-old department store, shuttered one of its three Yokosuka locations in 2010 after filing for bankruptcy because of declining sales, according to statements released by the company.

The 2,600-square-meter (27,987-square-foot) store was sold to Ichijo Co., a Tokyo-based condominium developer, which later canceled its plan for a 23-story apartment building and is turning the space into a parking lot.

“The construction of more new housing only leads to more vacant homes,” said Noriyuki Shima, chief examiner of Yokosuka’s planning commission who is in charge of luring home buyers to the city, including the Inariyato area. “It’s best to put a stop to this.”

Prices Halved

Residential land prices in Japan are still half what they were after the peak of the bubble economy in the 1980s. Prices for residential land sites in Tokyo have declined for each of the past 22 years except in 2007 and 2008, while the prices for land sites in regional areas have dropped for 21 years, land ministry data show.

The Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications conducts a national housing and land survey every five years. The next one is scheduled for later this year, with results to be announced next year.

Abe has promised to loosen business regulations and increase government support to help Japan’s industry as part of the “third arrow” of a three-pronged strategy to end decades of deflation and achieve a 2 percent inflation rate with fiscal and monetary stimulus. Government officials have also said they may consider relaxing development rules in certain zones to meet demand for office buildings and residential space in metropolitan areas.
UQ
 
Last edited:
The Fed has shown that aggressive and decisive action in monetary policy can get an economy out of a deflationary slump. The ECB and BOJ failed at that and as a result they continue with their policies of too little too late

Really? They have? When did that happen?
 
Back
Top