The Arizona "Audit"

gwb-trading said:
Actually states MUST run their elections and election audits within the requirements of federal election laws and civil rights acts -- to ensure they are not disenfranchising voters. The DOJ already told Arizona they could not go out and visit voters to confirm their votes (which a form of intimidation and violates federal law) and the Arizona "audit" clowns had to drop this part of their plan.
More...
---and here's a newsflash for you-----In the Presidential Election, states don't have to conduct a popular election at all. They can just send electors .
 
The reply's here confirm that the left is working hard to set a narrative that whatever comes out of this audit is invalid

 
Mercor said:
The reply's here confirm that the left is working hard to set a narrative that whatever comes out of this audit is invalid

More...


I think you're a decent dude, just misguided.

All recounts/audits must maintain the following conditions:

1) Be bipartisan

2) Chain of custody must be maintained at all times.

Huge 55 gallon wastebaskets adjacent to the counts seems like it could be a problem. "Testing" them for bamboo fibers may be a problem. Handing each "auditor" a black and blue pen may be a problem. Driving them out to some shack in the woods with no witnesses, seems a bit shady, yah.
 
destriero said:
I think you're a decent dude, just misguided.

All recounts/audits must maintain the following conditions:

1) Be bipartisan

2) Chain of custody must be maintained at all times.

Huge 55 gallon wastebaskets adjacent to the counts seems like it could be a problem. "Testing" them for bamboo fibers may be a problem. Handing each "auditor" a black and blue pen may be a problem. Driving them out to some shack in the woods with no witnesses, seems a bit shady, yah.
More...

Chain of custody, lmao. Ask Georgia how that works.


Everyone should wait and see what the audit uncovers, if anything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top