The Arizona "Audit"

Buy1Sell2 said:
So , as can be seen, The Dem House surplus was largely in states where incumbent House Democrat Senators were running for reelection.
More...


If the surplus was only in states with incumbent Democrat Senators they would have lost The House moron,especially with the huge gerrymandering advantage republicans have.
 
Buy1Sell2 said:
==The state of Washington, where Maria Cantwell, the Democrat incumbent, was running for reelection yielded an 840k surplus of Dem House votes.
==The State of Virginia, where Tim Kaine was running for reelection as the Democrat incumbent, yielded a 450k surplus of Dem House votes.
==The state of Michigan, where Debbie Stabenow was running for reelection as the Democrat incumbent, yielded a 325k surplus of Dem House votes.
==The state of Pennsylvania, where Bob Casey was running for reelection as the Democrat incumbent, yielded a 510k surplus of Dem House Votes.
More...


A Senate race does not produce House votes idiot.Trump supporters could have still voted for Trump to keep The House regardless of The Senate races,but just like 2016 and 2020 more people voted against Trump than for him.
 
---and finally Reader,
House races do not excite voters. They come out more when there is a Senate race. Thus, it is hard to vote for House candidate when you don't go to the polls.
 
Buy1Sell2 said:
---and finally Reader,
House races do not excite voters.
More...

Republicans weren't saying that when republicans took The House in 2010,Republicans were acting like that was the biggest accomplishment ever.And Republicans won The House by 5 million votes in 2010,just half of what Democrats won it by in 2018.
 
upload_2021-6-10_12-31-12.png
 
Reader---as I have outlined before, 2/3 of the Senate seats up for election in 2018 were held by Democrats. In 2010, it was just 50 percent. When it was 50 percent, Republicans won the popular Senate vote which also helped Republicans take a major number of House seats. The Senate races bring folks to the polls where they can also vote for The House. ---House races on their own do not typically excite voters, but a lot more money etc is put into Senate races , which are more meaningful and exciting. This is so simple and Stark has nothing to stand on here-----just more stretching of the truth from the anti-American.
 
Buy1Sell2 said:
Reader---as I have outlined before, 2/3 of the Senate seats up for election in 2018 were held by Democrats. In 2010, it was just 50 percent. When it was 50 percent, Republicans won the popular Senate vote which also helped Republicans take a major number of House seats. The Senate races bring folks to the polls where they can also vote for The House. ---House races on their own do not typically excite voters, but a lot more money etc is put into Senate races , which are more meaningful and exciting. This is so simple and Stark has nothing to stand on here-----just more stretching of the truth from the anti-American.
More...

Your point completely ignores that Republicans win low turnout elections while Democrats win high turnout ones. Supporting Republicans is Anti-Republican, they have always caused Death and Destruction.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top