That's a non-discretionary spending program, so how did he "do" it?So increasing the number of people of food stamps is good? That's what Odumbo has done.
That's a non-discretionary spending program, so how did he "do" it?So increasing the number of people of food stamps is good? That's what Odumbo has done.
No the FACT is you refuse to acknowledge that hard work and being educated is key to success in life and you prefer to be supportive of those who choose to be lazy, uneducated and live off the hard work (i.e taxpayer funded assistance) of others.
That's a non-discretionary spending program, so how did he "do" it?
That's a non-discretionary spending program, so how did he "do" it?
That's a non-discretionary spending program, so how did he "do" it?
There goes that FoxNews dogma again.
Ahhh yes ... once again instead of answering a direct question you post more of your unintelligent drivel.
It must suck to get your feeble brain stomped time and time again. I pity you.
By not doing anything to help the poor. Jobs created under Odumbo have been crappy, lower paying and many part time. Thus, he drives more people to food stamps.
When you start posting something other than unintelligent drivel, I might respond in kind. Though I doubt you'd understand it.
Interesting. He's a good man.Obama relaxed the Food Stamp (SNAP) eligibility criteria. This doubled the number of people on Food Stamps.