I would like to give some constructive critics.
When I watched your trades and the chart of the NQ I made the following reflection:
I think you should change your strategy and not trade such a small timeframes. You did 39 trades in a market that had at least one big move, but still ended up with a big loss. You hugely overtrade. Try to find the trend and let the profits run. You should have taken at least a big chunk in the move down. Afternoon was less trending and we see that clearly in your results as then you were pilling up the losses. Your average loss is also to big compared to your average profit. You cut your profits and let your losses run.
Your average losing trade made a loss of $250 and your average winning trade made $84 profit. You need 74.85% of winning trades just to be break even. So you can never make profits with these ratio's.
Go to larger timeframes and try to define the trend. Then just follow the trend. Far less trades, far less stress, and far more profits probably. I traded the ES which made basically the same moves. I took the drop almost completely and took in the last hour still a decent long. I missed in the afternoon a big part of the pullback, but what you miss is not important, only what you take is. So just 2 trades and a decent profit. Not trading is also trading. You don't have to jump in and out all day to be profitable. Be very selective.
I agree with you 100%. I normally don't overtrade in such a fashion, but yesterday I fell into the old trap of trying to chase a profit goal in chop in the afternoon, and by the time I realized I was in said chop it was too late. I kept trading to make up for a mistake in that noon hour, when my target was missed by like 2 ticks. That would have put me at nearly $1,000 up, which was my goal. It was a cavalcade of comedic errors after that.
I think the point of the post was that stops work in large trends, but not in chop?
