Sterling effort, but you've missed the latest news that Mav has gone over to the dark side. Where he once advocated manually scoring and examining to get deeper insight, he has now switched tack. I recall the time Partha advocated automated scoring and he discouraged it.
Alas, Mav encountered a gang of code heads, and has fallen in with them. Rather than lovingly taking hours to score a hundred number lines and looking at charts, he now gets the Russell 2000 and all FX and all commodities in minutes, together with probabilities for each trade.
He no longer looks at a 30D NL confirm as directional bias, he sometimes fades it.
Alas, I haven't met any code heads and I can't code yet. What I have realised is as an absolute rule using the 30D NL for directional bias is a waste of time. I use the 5D NL derivatives, not even the 5D NL. I still spend time scoring and studying charts, though mostly I can filter which charts to look at from my numbers.
I've had to add a couple of rules to filter. Ignore technicals when a fundamental release comes out. I just added another, do not trade the technicals a day before a fundamental release comes out, the big fish preposition and they really couldn't care less what my technicals say.
Took 3 quick losses Friday, worst single day in recent memory. This from a guy who is happy to lose 1R in 24 hours but hates it happening in an hour or three, forget 20 minutes in day trading.
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/the-acd-method.170318/page-1340#post-4467480
Would love to hear Mav and others' opinion on the current state of the NL. I feel Mav is still advocating its importance vs varying opinions from others. The thing is...the NL is very tedious to calculate...so if its importance is in question...I'd love to hear opinions. Maybe the low volatility market has dampen some of the significance of such a NL since NL is based on vol?
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.