Has anyone looked at refining their equities numberline scoring system to incorporate additional data?
To me it seems that if a stock scores a +6 on its 5-day numberline during a week where the S&P loses 5%, that is much more significant than if it put up the same +6 during a time where the S&P was ripping higher, and being aware of that dislocation could be valuable going forward
Conversely, if a stock has a +20 reading on its 30-day numberline, and then drops from a +10 to a +4 on its 5-day, and during the last 3 trading days the stock's price has fallen 15% on big volume, that "additional" information might be telling you to run for the hills, even though your 30-day and 5-day lines are still relatively strong.
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Mav, just following up to this regarding tweaking my individual equities 30 Day #L to account for "outlier" days....if you don't mind, which of the adjustments below do you think would be most valuable?
1) Applying some type of multiplier to increase daily score when stock significantly diverts from broad market (ex: stock makes good A up & gains >=2% on the day while S&P500 loses >=1%, and vice versa for A-downs).
2) same as above, but also include requirement that stock move was also accompanied by greater than average trading volume.
3) applying multiplier at the end of week if 5-day #L significantly outperforms S&P500 5-day #L.
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
