Quote from Maverick74:
Wow, just saw his thread. I think Lescor's numbers show exactly what is going on in the industry, especially in the equity world. I just talked to my mentor from my Worldco days 10 years ago. He was bar none the best equity trader I have "personally" met. He was the definition of consistency. So I was eager to ask him how he was doing in this market environment. He is a tape reader for listed stocks. It turns out he quit trading for the most part in 2009. He said the equity industry just completely changed. Completely new world. That was pretty shocking.
As for me personally, I ran a market neutral options strategy utilizing ACD for equities Jan through Aug and had my best risk adjusted performance ever. The last QTR of the year I began experimenting with other strategies partly due to some of the changes at my firm which you are aware of Shan. I started making some transitions. I was pleased with the last QTR but I did a lot less trading and a lot more building and developing of new strategies.
Most people who know me know I am "always" working on new ideas and new strategies. Regardless of whether what I'm doing at the time works or not because I'm all too aware of how quickly things change in this business. I have discussed that at length on this thread.
I do not know anyone who works at a prop firm, so my questions are based off my experience running a business and general business experience.
Maverick74, your ex boss- the best equity trader quit business because equity industry have completely changed ? Where was his firm research , intellectual capital to help him with strategies to trade in a changing environment?
Good traders are tough to come by. If a trader at a prop firm has to be a top notch trader plus he has to come up with strategies to keep up with changing market, why even bother working for a firm?
Prop firm business model may be different from a typical business model. Why put research and trading burden on on trader?
Asking a trader to be a both a trader and an expert on running models to come up strategies/ an edge is like asking TOM BRADY to come up with game tactical and strategic game plan for each team and subsequently each player New England Patriots are playing.
A good firm should be able to have a separate research department to feed traders ideas?
This model seems to be more effective then letting a star equity trader quit because markets have changed?
You can tell I am confused (lol).