Quote from Samsara:
Agreed: and right on. For those of us who've been at this for a while, I think what you've demonstrated and talked about with ACD really hits it home. Not like anything else I've seen on ET. I'm personally incredibly grateful people like you and Fisher are willing to provide a view into this.
Trading is like that anyway: you have to make any method your own. I've never seen anyone successfully translate their own successful skill to others. You only stand behind the risk of your positions if you fully get what goes into them.
I'm all for talking about the process I'm going through building out my own "lens" here -- that's all I'm saying. In other words, it's not a bad thing that people are trying to figure out what aspects of the method are logical for their own strategies. Some may be looking for magical levels, but I think many are just trying to understand how and when the theory has utility.
ACD, from what I can see, is structural method. Your signals are your own. ACD is a good way to look at, and filter, some of your own signals. The method forces one to keep price action in mind at all times. It keeps one from trading indicators rather than price, which most all newbie traders do. With ACD as a template, price itself is the indicator.

