Volatility vs. direction is an important distinction. Do you think that quant/TA analysis techniques like ACD and others are more effective at identifying inflection points for volatility than picking a direction?Quote from RCG Trader:
Or.....you can specialize in one entity that has good volatility or good cycling over the last say, 5 years.
Every instrument is the same in so much as volatility cycles are concerned.
Pick a target, learn it's habitat, and wait for the correct moments to strike.
Quote from Trader13:
Volatility vs. direction is an important distinction. Do you think that quant/TA analysis techniques like ACD and others are more effective at identifying inflection points for volatility than picking a direction?
Thanks, I understood the previous discussion, and you clearly use ACD in one manner. I introduced a new question.Quote from Shanb:
ACD is used to help form a bias for direction. No one said anything about using to help pick inflection points for vol!
The discussion was about the similarity between mean reversion strategies and selling volatility, while momentum strategies tend to mimic a long vol strategy.
Quote from Trader13:
Point taken and insights greatly appreciated (Shan). My questions are trying to broaden the discussion of ACD beyond the topics already covered.
Quote from Trader13:
Point taken and insights greatly appreciated (Shan). My questions are trying to broaden the discussion of ACD beyond the topics already covered.
Quote from Trader13:
Volatility vs. direction is an important distinction. Do you think that quant/TA analysis techniques like ACD and others are more effective at identifying inflection points for volatility than picking a direction?