.............. The best is going at it alone and hiring college kids ad each get different areas for the programming.............
That didn't go well for Cameron Winklevoss and Tyler Winklevoss.
.............. The best is going at it alone and hiring college kids ad each get different areas for the programming.............
That didn't go well for Cameron Winklevoss and Tyler Winklevoss.
What problem is this venture attempting to solve? What is the end product that will be monetized?
', a significant improvement from the previous UI which also had a button 'Lose money! The best is going at it alone and hiring college kids ad each get different areas for the programming.
I think the OP might need to raise his bid. No one good is going to hit his $1000 bid.
Problem: proprietary trading strategy. End product: prop shop, started by shop runners, used by shop runners. No snake oil as "I've built this amazing software product which really makes money, not a scam really, I'm using it myself and make tons of money, let my grandma die if I'm lying (she's dead already), so much money actually that I'm generously selling it to you too for a very reasonable fee so you too can make money like me and be successful. It's also very easy to use, anyone can do it, the entire UI consists of a single button labeled 'Make money!', a significant improvement from the previous UI which also had a button 'Lose money!
' and silly clients kept pushing it".
Programming is not a problem, I can do anything by myself. The problem is finding an edge. And while I'm working hard on it and eventually I *will* find it (them), I'm also considering the option of joining forces with someone in my situation.
I *did* find people interested in what they call a collaboration, problem's the value they attribute to that collaboration.
Essentially I've found lot of guys looking to test their wild research idea for free, me coding it for them and splitting the profits, should the thing prove to be profitable.
There are several problems with this:
1) The only value "free" has is zero and I'm not wasting my time on something that's worth nothing.
2) I'm never in a shortage of ideas myself and experience says most of them fail lamentably and very few have some slight value which can be used in further research, asymptotically achieving profitability.
Problem's to get those ideas I'm investing time (overtime work after day job), money (buying marketdata fees, renting an apartment close to work so I save commute time and use it for development instead of wasting it in transit) and above all knowledge (programming at a level where I can essentially do *anything* that's done today and math / quant finance at PhD level, continuously accumulating new stuff and filter the existing to get a grasp what works and what not).
So I'm *very* well aware of how hard it is technically, monetarily and finding the time to work on it. And I'm sorry to say but NOONE of the guys who proposed "code my ideas for free" is remotely close to what I'd consider valuable in terms of knowledge, time worked or at least spending some measly HARD MONEY on their ideas.
Therefore NO FREE CODING from me. I'm re-instating the 2x$1000 / month idea in order to make such guys evntually grok their problem: FREE IS WORTHLESS. If you don't invest HARD MONEY in TESTING your ideas (which you are very aware they have a very high chance of failure so you're not committing hard money on them), then you're gonna have to find another sucker or just (learn to) program it yourself.
Got it. I am taking a different approach. Rather than focussing on discovering a single profitable strategy, I am building a platform that will dramatically reduce the time required to find profitable strategies. As I see it, a huge problem for Algo traders is finding strategies that have an edge and determining when their strategies no longer have an edge. So the product is not a magical strategy that will make the customer rich, but rather a toolbox that can quickly help to test their ideas so they can find their own strategies.