The #1 Skill In Selling Options

[newwurldmn]

Temporal is a big word.

I think you added it as a filler.

A zero sum game is always zero sum. So you can’t always lose being long an option (because of theta) and being short an option (because of gamma). And we know no one gives a fuck about delta so we’ll ignore that.

You obviously didn't understand what I wrote. I never doubted the fact that it's not a zero-sum game on an individual basis i.e. when one person wins, the other person must be losing by the same amount but I just observed that the payoff from that zero-sum game is not equitable or symmetrical on an overall temporal basis.

It's OK you don't get it.

 

[newwurldmn]

Noobs don’t spout nonsense and then dogmatically claim it’s true. You aren’t a noob. Right?

How many times did you call me “shit?”

still waiting on those academic papers with the proof of your claims.

Everyone is nice to noobs?? LOL Sure if they agree to your bs otherwise they are on PCP, LSD right? LOL like what you wrote here:



They can't have their own opinion and god forbid that they want to stick to their own opinion. They have to accept your garbage as the bible right? LOL Anyway like I said, you are just a troll. You haven't really given me any empirical proof or mathematical calculations that counters what I have proposed. What you observed what MM does is not it. Since you are just a troll, I just treat you like semi-entertainment, not always funny but hey it helps me pass the time since trading gets boring sometimes.

 

[TheDawn]

Temporal is a big word.

I think you added it as a filler.

No I meant it, in a temporal sense. You don't understand it that's why you think it's a filler. Like I said before,

You obviously didn't understand what I wrote. I never doubted the fact that it's not a zero-sum game on an individual basis i.e. when one person wins, the other person must be losing by the same amount but I just observed that the payoff from that zero-sum game is not equitable or symmetrical on an overall temporal basis.

It's OK you don't get it.

A zero sum game is always zero sum. So you can’t always lose being long an option (because of theta) and being short an option (because of gamma). And we know no one gives a fuck about delta so we’ll ignore that.

Hence it's in a temporal sense. And no delta is irrelevant. If you understood what I was trying to say or at least tried to understand it, you would understand why.

 

[TheDawn]

Noobs don’t spout nonsense and then dogmatically claim it’s true. You aren’t a noob. Right?

Is this relevant to what I was discussing?

How many times did you call me “shit?”

about 10 times I believe although I stand to be corrected.

still waiting on those academic papers with the proof of your claims.

Ok I will post the links to them here once I find them again.

 

[newwurldmn]

You aren’t a noob. Same rules don’t apply to you.

you are welcome to reiterate your points whenever you want. Or show those academic papers. Pretty much everyone else in this thread agrees with me (certainly those who have extensive experience trading options).

Trolls call others “troll”

Is this relevant to what I was discussing?



about 10 times I believe although I stand to be corrected.

 

[taowave]

Dawn,it's pretty clear that you aren't making real money trading.

You have a golden opportunity to learn from some very successful traders who are very generous....

Check your ego, forget what you believe to be true and ask intelligent questions....

 

[lucysparabola]

Dawn,it's pretty clear that you aren't making real money trading.

You have a golden opportunity to learn from some very successful traders who are very generous....

Check your ego, forget what you believe to be true and ask intelligent questions....

the ego is the problem. usually is.

nobody is out hunting you down. if you're ever able to realize that, then you can at least have a chance.

 

[newwurldmn]

the ego is the problem. usually is.

nobody is out hunting you down. if you're ever able to realize that, then you can at least have a chance.

There was a Wall Street titan (that some in this thread knew personally) who once said something like "They know all the greeks but one: hubris"

 

[ETJ]

35-year back data and we archive off-site. Again, it's empirical not academic.

I also didn't insult you - I said it was fun watching you guys snipe at each other.

You want a disparaging comment. Monohan said all the index ETFs were 100,000 up back then on the ISE and you guys quit anyway.

 

[newwurldmn]

35-year back data and we archive off-site. Again, it's empirical not academic.

I also didn't insult you - I said it was fun watching you guys snipe at each other.

You want a disparaging comment. Monohan said all the index ETFs were 100,000 up back then on the ISE and you guys quit anyway.

I don't follow this post.

I said the QQQ's were 100k up. Who is Monohan?