vulture...im sort of tired...don't know how deep I can get into this...
every debt contract has some sort of foreclosure clause...in a crisis the asset is transferred to the lender (redistribution to a corp or govt' entity) who then dumps it to an investor (corp, gov't, or individual) who then remortgages it to someone else... that's the cycle.
Its success depends on succeeding generations of wage earners with doable credit ratings...(implications of the economic impact of population depletion owing to 30 million aborted babies in a generation might make an interesting study).
When it happens on a mass scale, it is epochal event...when the average Joe loses his home because he didn't realize he was in an easy money bubble, the fruit of his labor is redistributed... should he have known better? Maybe...
Even property owned outright has a repossession clause imposed by some taxing authority...a right to redistribute. Must stay on the treadmill to keep your stuff...or mark up someone else's time and talents...either way, it's an awful racket...
Then there is the whole notion of redistrubution of assets by liens owing to civil and legal actions, and we all know how fair lawsuits are...(I remember reading a long time ago that the EPA settled a lawsuit against Goodrich by taking an equity stake in the company--Ayn Rand called it 'force and fraud' -- write the laws to suit you and give yourself the authority to seize assets or revoke rights).
Private property is a precious thing indeed -- absolutely inseperable from liberty and dignity for every individual --and sometimes it's just an illusion. As the management of society shifts to 'aggregates' instead of individual personal relationships the whole beautiful concept gets perverted. I'm not arguing against government or the rule of law but things have gone quite abit astray from the spirit of the founders and their God.
Someone said that the success of the Republic depends on the God-fearingness of its citizens. When people don't fear God, they become irresponsible. When they become irresponsible, the government grows into a grotesque, smothering nanny with a bad temper (often staffed by those who resent the successes of the responsible). And the thrift and industry of the responsible is confiscated to support the irresponsible.
I have alot to say about the socialization of assets and risk but haven't had time articulate it....
I'm definitely painting an ugly side of it here...