Quote from AlpineTrout:
Killing another human is the correct course of action in certain situations. I'll give examples:
1) You come home from work and see a man inside your house beating the hell out of your wife and child. Dead man.
2) In the middle of the night, after hearing broken glass you go downstairs and see a man coming in through your window. Dead man.
3) You happen to find yourself in a terrorist situation at the local Mickey D's along with 20 other scared people, but have your handgun and the terrorist isn't looking. Dead man.
4) Murder cases in which evidence is 100% certain. Execute the man and don't take years to do it.
It wouldn't cost nearly as much to permanently incarcerate murderers if the rightwing hadn't insisted on also locking up almost everybody who ever smoked a joint.Quote from CaptainObvious:
It's far less expensive IF justice is not delayed by the pantie wearing crowd like yourself. The term is Capital Punishment. The operative word is punishment. It's not Capital Reform, or Capital Retribution, or Capital Revenge , it's PUNISHMENT!!
Quote from AlpineTrout:
Killing another human is the correct course of action in certain situations. I'll give examples:
1) You come home from work and see a man inside your house beating the hell out of your wife and child. Dead man.
2) In the middle of the night, after hearing broken glass you go downstairs and see a man coming in through your window. Dead man.
3) You happen to find yourself in a terrorist situation at the local Mickey D's along with 20 other scared people, but have your handgun and the terrorist isn't looking. Dead man.
4) Murder cases in which evidence is 100% certain. Execute the man and don't take years to do it.
Quote from AlpineTrout:
How about the Brian Nichols case in Atlanta. He murdered a judge right in front of many people while in court and I believe its on video as well. That's 100%.
Quote from Arnie:
In some states you can be charged with manslaughter in scenario #2.
Quote from killthesunshine:
In all seriousness there is almost always some doubt. How many those incarcerated for life have been exonerated many years later after discovery of error resulting from better DNA testing for example?
Quote from AlpineTrout:
I knew there would be at least one poster to say this, that's why I mentioned the Brian Nichols case. There is no doubt. NONE.
I understand what your saying. But there are some cases in which there is zero doubt.