These guys seem to take it lightly
https://www.google.com/webhp?source...pv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=most+overturned+appeals+court
Temp Halt gets overturned?
- Thread starter achilles28
- Start date
These guys seem to take it lightly
https://www.google.com/webhp?source...pv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=most+overturned+appeals+court
I once was robbed by a small claims court judge, with no skin in the game, who took a reversible error lightly. How many times have we heard, if you don't like it you can appeal?
So yes, i think it is entirely possible.
I was pleased to see that same judge lose an election when he tried to elevate himself to superior court.
This judge probably feels insulated against instant karma.
But already, bills are being drafted to make elected Mayors of sanctuary cities have more skin in the game, and make them liable to suits brought by victims of crimes committed by illegals that should have been turned over to ICE.
I wouldn't be surprised to see something similar extended to such judges.
Oh, well, then. That settles it.
Compared to other, higher branches of government, this judge is small claims, with as much skin in the game as the one that skinned me.
Please don't muddy the waters with facts.
I have no idea why a judge thinks he can use a TRO to stop an immigration halt.
I can see him or her thinking they can allow people in on a case by case basis. With a stipulation that the people be heavily vetted or even detained.... But where in the world does a Judge think they have a right to over rule the president on immigration matters with a TRO.
The administration absolutely did not have to listen to this judge... particularly outside of the judges district.
This type of over reach does the judicial branch a massive disservice.
---
today's edit...
I wrote this last night... I did not post it because the phone rang.
I see breitbart has an article explaining this today.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/02/06/travesty-legal-errors-immigration-eo-lawsuit/
I can see him or her thinking they can allow people in on a case by case basis. With a stipulation that the people be heavily vetted or even detained.... But where in the world does a Judge think they have a right to over rule the president on immigration matters with a TRO.
The administration absolutely did not have to listen to this judge... particularly outside of the judges district.
This type of over reach does the judicial branch a massive disservice.
---
today's edit...
I wrote this last night... I did not post it because the phone rang.
I see breitbart has an article explaining this today.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/02/06/travesty-legal-errors-immigration-eo-lawsuit/
Who let the dogma out?
A federal judge in Texas temporarily blocks executive action on immigration.
United States District Judge Andrew Hanen ruled Monday night to block executive actions.
Hanen halted the executive action, ruling that the administration had failed to comply with the Administrative Procedure Act, which calls for the White House to afford a longer notification and comment period before taking action.
Obama vowed to abide by the immigration court order.
United States District Judge Andrew Hanen ruled Monday night to block executive actions.
Hanen halted the executive action, ruling that the administration had failed to comply with the Administrative Procedure Act, which calls for the White House to afford a longer notification and comment period before taking action.
Obama vowed to abide by the immigration court order.