Tell me why averaging down is a bad idea .

LOGICAL REASON. The market is NOT logical, never has and never will be. It just does whatever it wants to do. You might think it's logical to average down because eventually the market will reverse but the market might never reverse or does not reverse for a very very very very long time. What then? What happens to the positions that you averaged down? Those "small pull back" that you have done? What if the market never comes back up(down ) after those "small pull back"'s? All those terms like "pull backs" are only from hindsight, after the fact. It's only when the market reversed AFTER those "pull backs" that you can say they are just "pull backs" and qualify them further by saying they are "small" but if the market never reversed afterward then these would not be "pull backs"; these would be called "reversal points" but you won't know that until you've already spent the money to "average down" and then you are stuck.

The bottomline is that you have to understand WHICH markets you can pull off the averaging down methodology. The price structure of stock index futures (the vast majority of the time) is going to be mean reverting and enable a profitable exit on the scale (typically on the scale down buy, not the inverse). Do not attempt in crude oil, nor in various other commodities as they do not have this sort of price structure.
 
I think there is a good deal of value in studying the time of day reversal patterns as well. It's not really much of a secret, widely discounted really, but time and time again, these sharp drop days have a tendency to reverse on a dime at a very specific hour...

And I agree with that also. There was some post I made a long time ago here, which pointed out those times. The most common one was the 10:30 AM reversal. On average, that is the best time to look for a shift in market behavior. But damn, when it goes wrong, it goes wrong hard many times. You wind up finding yourself in a true full trend day for a LOT of points.

It is a pattern I started to recognize, and was getting good at. Unfortunately I could not make use of it today because the Jackson Hole thing has me ferklempt. Just imagine what we'll know tomorrow.
 
Maybe I'm in the minority here, but I do think Volpri offers some value. I realize that these discussions are pretty binary, not much left for nuance (it wasn't like this in the old days, but alas...). I think there is a good deal of value in studying the time of day reversal patterns as well. It's not really much of a secret, widely discounted really, but time and time again, these sharp drop days have a tendency to reverse on a dime at a very specific hour. The concept of averaging down into these events is not foolhardy (within reason).
Bingo on that time of day concept!
 
The bottomline is that you have to understand WHICH markets you can pull off the averaging down methodology. The price structure of stock index futures (the vast majority of the time) is going to be mean reverting and enable a profitable exit on the scale (typically on the scale down buy, not the inverse). Do not attempt in crude oil, nor in various other commodities as they do not have this sort of price structure.
Bingo again!
 
And I agree with that also. There was some post I made a long time ago here, which pointed out those times. The most common one was the 10:30 AM reversal. On average, that is the best time to look for a shift in market behavior. But damn, when it goes wrong, it goes wrong hard many times. You wind up finding yourself in a true full trend day for a LOT of points.

It is a pattern I started to recognize, and was getting good at. Unfortunately I could not make use of it today because the Jackson Hole thing has me ferklempt. Just imagine what we'll know tomorrow.

From my experience, the 11:00AM (ct) pattern was in play for quite a long time. Eventually it sort of migrated away (at times it was front run), then for a short while it migrated to 12:00pm (ct). A day like today, as an example, looked and felt like the pulled bids into the regular TOD reversal spot. The real psychological issue that can trip me up and get me to unload early is just how compressed the vol. gets at the lows of the day. Basically, it's just a binary move into a very specific price support (frequently you find it on the daily chart with an important closing price from several days prior), but most traders want that "spring" action to sell into and during this Trump era I've noticed that the price structure has changed quite significantly (even from say 2015-16) which still had significant periods of time that resembled price structure from 10-15-20 years ago.
 
From my experience, the 11:00AM (ct) pattern was in play for quite a long time. Eventually it sort of migrated away (at times it was front run), then for a short while it migrated to 12:00pm (ct). A day like today, as an example, looked and felt like the pulled bids into the regular TOD reversal spot. The real psychological issue that can trip me up and get me to unload early is just how compressed the vol. gets at the lows of the day. Basically, it's just a binary move into a very specific price support (frequently you find it on the daily chart with an important closing price from several days prior), but most traders want that "spring" action to sell into and during this Trump era I've noticed that the price structure has changed quite significantly (even from say 2015-16) which still had significant periods of time that resembled price structure from 10-15-20 years ago.

Well, as I mentioned, we'll see how it pans out tomorrow. He starts yapping at 10AM ET, and the ol' 10:30 reversal time is going to be complete fubar the longer he yaps. Bias it down for the first few minutes though.
 
We have been taught many myths IMO and it is hard to undo all that BS and actually get on the right track.
I do completely agree with you. I see it with my trades all the time and how many of them would benefit from a scale-in versus a stop-out. My trades are also not nearly as well thought out as you.

The benefits of this really come into play with the micro contracts. Assume you used to trade the ES and use a 2 point stop, so you have $100 on the line. Now with the mES, you can scale into your position. You can still use a $100 stop, but if you structure it so that you enter 2 micro contracts at one level, and then 2 points away add around 2 when it goes against you, instead of taking the stop-out, you will actually much more often end up with a profit.

Also, what I see over and over again, is that once price takes off in a direction you expected, it often means that you're not getting a good price. Say you wanted in at 2900, but all you can get now is 2902. Well, price can very well test 2900 again, or even dip down to 2899, a whole 3 points away, and this still wouldn't be considered a broke level, just a poke. So if you know that you will start with 2 micro contracts at 2902 and not sweat it it goes against you, because you will buy more at an even better price, psychologically, this will be very beneficial.

The key really is having a stop. So spreading out your entries and having a stop is much easier to accomplish than trying to precision enter the trade. From all the trades posted, I can say 90% of entries would benefit from a scale-in at a better price if your position size allows for multiple contracts, which is easy to do with the micros.
 
The market is more logical than you think and it has inertia. It doesn’t do whatever it wants. It is not a living being with a will of it’s own. It is a conglomeration of buyers and sellers pushing to get the upper hand. On every bar. I repeat on every bar they are pushing. If one knows this there are ways to detect who is winning. And winners generally win for at least abit. It is all about odds. There are moments of extreme clarity in price action. To say we are at the mercy of a vengeful broad who is fickle, with that broad being the market, is a great misconception. There is a rhyme and reason as to what happens in the markets.

The market can go up. It can and will go down. It can go sideways. As a matter of a fact it has always done these three things. And if it is going up a trader should be able to tell when that trend is weakening. Same for downtrends. Averaging down is useful because I may not get the exact perfect entry but I can see where the pressures are. And I take a bet on that. If I am wrong I will GET THE HELL OUT. I entered knowing it is based on probabilities and if the unexpected, or lower probability event happens, I know what I will do. I have contingencies in place. Is a counter trend move likely gonna be a PB or a reversal? Context has alot to do with it in terms of probabilities.

Of course, my illustrations are hindsight. For the most part. Can I draw channels...ranges..trendlines..triangles..flags...on non-existent charts to illustrate a point? Or to illustrate a probability? Maybe I should try. That is, just get a blank page and draw every line I can think of to illustrate a point or two. Ridiculous right? THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH ILLUSTRATING POINTS AND EXAMPLES AFTER THEY HAVE HAPPENED IN A WAY PEOPLE CAN SEE AND UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPTS. IT IS HOW WE LEARN.

The airplane could fall. It could take off. It could crash. It could turn left or right. It could stall. It could nose dive straight into the ground. So...I just gonna get in it, crank her up, and see what she does. Little ridiculous, don’t you think. When I went to flight school I learned, first, in ground school about the theory and concepts of flight and why a chunk of metal can be constructed and used in such away to take advantage of pressures and forces created by airflow.speed..gravity..thrust...etc to actually get off the ground and sail through the air.

Then I saw it demonstrated by my flight instructor and I was briefed. Then it came my turn and I actually took off and flew the damned thing. Did some maneuvers....etc. There is a rhyme and reason to flying that requires that skills be learned (including contingencies) and checklist are used before every takeoff. All this to be successful. Same thing in trading.
Otherwise, we are all just a bunch of jackasses on ET spinning our wheels in the mud trying our damndest to learn something that can NEVER be learned and we are a bunch of fools for believing we can because it is all random and can never be known with sufficient skill to become successful. We would be absolute idiots with Barron being the only smart one because he has figured out a way to get us fools yapping at one another while he rolls in the $$$.

What do you think? If you had to take a position would you go long or short next? Or sit on your ass wringing your hands breaking out in a cold sweat?

Sorry for being so blunt but I am getting tired of people talking about hindsight for this or that. All learning starts with an analysis of hindsight and applying that to the future in similar circumstances. Nothing is ever perfect or 100% except that one’s wife is gonna spend all the money she can at Dillards. You can bet on that!

So what do you say? Long or short?

View attachment 207600

So HOW do you know that this time this market "inertia" will pull it back and continue its original trend and not reverse the trend to go in the other direction?

"Of course, my illustrations are hindsight. For the most part."

If your illustration is all based on hindsight then it's not worth much. Everybody is a genius in hindsight. Past performance is not indicative of future performances. Just because the market pulled back several times before continuing on a huge trend doesn't mean the next time that it will pull back the next time. And the past few "average down" that you did could've landed you in a margin call way before the market finally reverses and continues its original trend. What then?

Key to successful trading is not being right. It's having enough money to cash in on being right. Once you've made enough losses, you will realize this.
 
The bottomline is that you have to understand WHICH markets you can pull off the averaging down methodology. The price structure of stock index futures (the vast majority of the time) is going to be mean reverting and enable a profitable exit on the scale (typically on the scale down buy, not the inverse). Do not attempt in crude oil, nor in various other commodities as they do not have this sort of price structure.

Yes but the market changes. It's dynamic. It could exhibit one type of market structure for many years and all of sudden it would change for one year and you won't know it until after the fact. That's the problem.
 
Here is some averaging down trades in MES and ES this morning. The big drop afterwards I would have shorted too and made a bundle but I left the Motorhome to go to the house and eat breakfast. Now mind you JSOP these were taken and placed there by the platform as I took them.. Of course, JSOP the charts are hindsight BUT the darn trades are not drawn in by hand in hindsite. The platform placed them as I took them.

Now lets explore a scenario. Say I averaged in per the chart entries but DID not exit per the chart exits. Then comes the big drop (I am assuming Powell is yapping). So very suddenly I am caught in a losing position. What do I do? I'm caught in the big drop shortly after I made my profits now what?

Well..I know exactly where I would have exited with my loss, doubled up, went short, and not only would I have made my loss back but a bundle more and way more than I made in my successful averaging down entries and exits on the chart.


I did not even see that drop till I got back to the motorhome.

Yes the chart is hindsite. I can't take a snapshot of a chart that doesn't yet exist, now can I? But the trades are placed there by the platform as I took them not drawn in by me.

These trades $682.50. Over about a 25 minute time span for ALL of them in both MES and ES. So...don't tell me averaging down doesn't work. It will IF you know what your are doing. Is that my wife's car cranking and heading for Dillards?

The biggest thing is that traders have no contingencies plans of what do if the market does this instead of that after their entry. Instead they are just sitting there on a log HOPING they gonna make some money from their entries and viola their SL is hit knocking them off the log. They get up trembling and are afraid to do what they should do which is GO IN THE OTHER DIRECTION if that side is winning. If not sure which side is winning, then wait for clarity.

Just look at the darn chart. From the open who was winning? It opened gap down. Looks like the bears got the open. But as you say the market is dynamic. What happens? bulls take command 6 bars later but bears push back hard trying to squash bulls. Bears attempt fail on that big bar and bulls win the bar. The bears are pissed..well maybe..who knows..They push back on the 8th and 9th bar pushing price down but bulls win in the end pushing back even harder and close 9th bar bullish. Everybody positioning for Mr P yapping. By 10th bar bulls have won. The suspense is great. 13th and 14th bar are good for scalping. Everyone is holding their breath......why? Mr P is speaking, or has spoken. I don't listen to him. The market digest what he says. I am out. The reaction takes place. I'm eating breakfast.

Wife has left the house!

8-23 es one.PNG


8-23 Mes one.PNG
 
Last edited:
Back
Top