Teflon Trump. Americans voted for the Country Ban. Polls won't give a shit. Watch.

This is the face of trump's opposition. I wonder who voters will favor?

The Daily CallerVerified account‏@DailyCaller 16h16 hours ago


Protesters Chant ‘No Borders, No Nations, Stop The Deportations’ [VIDEO] http://trib.al/QwEYrFBpic.twitter.com/RZP20VIgO1

C3X9GdDWQAEtxSx.jpg
 
This is the kind of shit Americans won't stand for. Trump intimated many many times about this kind of stuff. all over.

Well, they do stand for it in Minnesota. I should say the official policy of the Minneapolis and state government is to stand for it. Plenty of residents are outraged but they have plenty of morons who support it. So you get a situation just like we have in Washington DC where these thugs go out and intimidate people and the cops serve as their own security force to protect them from street justice.

The article pointed out that the media, as well as the police, have zero interest in this kind of hate crime. They weren't at all interested in the other documented cases of Somali thugs harassing gays, which Minneapolis has in abundance. You can imagine the news coverage if some whites were doing the same thing.
 
Not trying to discredit this particular article, just wanted to comment a bit on Alex Jones. I listened to Howard Stern interviewing him on Stern's show and - holy shit - that guy is a wack job. I'm not saying he might be correct in some spheres, but after hearing how off the deep end he is, I can't take anything he says at face value without a significant review of the information.

Infowars is a news aggragator like Drudge, ZeroHedge, Brietbart. Unlike those, they also have commentary and opinion segments, from in-house staff, issued on camera without any teleprompters.

Articles coming from outside are often presented as if from Infowars, in Infowars web format. It's hard to tell who is writing the article unless you find the link that goes out onto the web. When articles are re-presented this way, i suppose they may be spun. Or, un-spun depending on your point of view.

There's a lot of borrowing and sharing amongst news aggratators. Not saying it's an echo chamber but there's only so much breaking news out there.
 
Infowars is a news aggragator like Drudge, ZeroHedge, Brietbart. Unlike those, they also have commentary and opinion segments, from in-house staff, issued on camera without any teleprompters.

Articles coming from outside are often presented as if from Infowars, in Infowars web format. It's hard to tell who is writing the article unless you find the link that goes out onto the web. When articles are re-presented this way, i suppose they may be spun. Or, un-spun depending on your point of view.

There's a lot of borrowing and sharing amongst news aggratators. Not saying it's an echo chamber but there's only so much breaking news out there.

Again, I'm just talking about Alex Jones.
 
Most Support Temporary Ban on Newcomers from Terrorist Havens

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...porary_ban_on_newcomers_from_terrorist_havens

Rasmussen poll

Monday, January 30, 2017

Most voters approve of President Trump’s temporary halt to refugees and visitors from several Middle Eastern and African countries until the government can do a better job of keeping out individuals who are terrorist threats.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 57% of Likely U.S. Voters favor a temporary ban on refugees from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen until the federal government approves its ability to screen out potential terrorists form coming here. Thirty-three percent (33%) are opposed, while 10% are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Similarly, 56% favor a temporary block on visas prohibiting residents of Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen from entering the United States until the government approves its ability to screen for likely terrorists. Thirty-two percent (32%) oppose this temporary ban, and 11% are undecided.

This survey was taken late last week prior to the weekend protests against Trump’s executive orders imposing a four-month ban on all refugees and a temporary visa ban on visitors from these seven countries.

These findings have changed little from August when 59% of voters agreed with Trump’s call for a temporary ban on immigration into the United States from "the most dangerous and volatile regions of the world that have a history of exporting terrorism” until the federal government improves its ability to screen out potential terrorists.

The survey of 1,000 Likely Voters was conducted on January 25-26, 2017 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

Only 16% of Americans think this country can ever be made completely safe from terrorist attacks in general, although 52% of voters say the federal government does not focus enough on the threat of domestic Islamic terrorism.

The refugee ban is supported by 82% of Republicans and 59% of voters not affiliated with either major party. Democrats are opposed by a 53% to 34% margin. The numbers are nearly identical for the temporary ban on visas from these seven terrorist-plagued nations.

Men and women are in general agreement on both measures. Younger voters are slightly less supportive than their elders are.

Blacks oppose both bans more than whites and other majority voters do.

Among voters who Strongly Approve of the job Trump is doing, over 70% support both bans. Similar numbers of those who Strongly Disapprove of his job performance are opposed.

Most voters opposed former President Obama’s plan to bring tens of thousands of Middle Eastern and African refugees here this year. Sixty-two percent (62%) said Obama’s plan posed an increased national security risk to the United States.

Obama and Hillary Clinton wouldn’t say it for fear of offending Muslims worldwide, but most voters continue to believe the United States is at war with radical Islamic terrorism. Trump declared war on radical Islamic terrorists in his inaugural speech.

During the campaign, voters felt Trump would do a better job than Clinton protecting them from terrorists.

Just 32% think the United States is safer now after eight years of the Obama presidency. In late December, 34% of voters said the United States will be safer from domestic terror attacks five years from now. Twenty-seven percent (27%) believe it will be less safe, while 32% expect the level of danger to be about the same.

Last January, 72% of voters said the federal government is not aggressive enough in finding those who have overstayed their visas and sending them home. Sixty-eight percent (68%) considered those who overstay their visas in this country to be a serious national security risk.
 
that is what is so funny about this soros paid for reaction to a simple ban.

it only shows Americans that the left is not only whacky, but they are dangerous.
this protests make Trump look like an even better pick.
Schumer crying. Does anyone take that b.s. seriously.

if the left wants to make Trump a one term president... they will have to start caring about tax paying voters.

74% of Californians are against sanctuary cities according to a poll by Berkeley. So how does this sanctuary city stuff play out against for the rest of the country.
Trump wins again. The Democrats are marginalizing themselves and they are too much of an echo chamber to see it.

Go schumer. you are worse than reid for your team.
 
Last edited:
I for one hope this debate keeps going, right up until the midterm elections. It's got to be the dems' weakest issue, and now they are seen to be in revolt over minor common sense reforms. They just lost an election over immigration, yet they are intent on doubling down on the same policy. They should at least have pretended they are against illegal immigration and lax screening of refugees. Instead they allowed Trump to paint them into a corner with violent criminal aliens. This is one of those issues where the voters are not looking for nuance.
 
Back
Top