Technicians with holes in their shoes and frayed shirt collars

Looks like the statement continues to scare the $hit out of him

:D

Quote from ProfLogic:

As always this statement scared the $hit out of you:

"unless you have a large chunk of money you would like to part with to validate it."

If TA is HOG WASH it should be "easy pickins" to fleece me out of my money proving that my stuff is crap. But you always tuck your tail and run when confronted. You try to talk a good game but, as usual, you back it up with the your typical verbal diarrhea.
 
Well, why don't you create some upside. If you 'win' you can donate HIS money to charity.

Sorry Gary, but as it stands right now it sounds like you are afraid to put your money against his.

Quote from garyjohn:

Not in the least. There is no upside other than shaming the Prof that will come from putting up any capital. Believe it or not, I have no interest in shaming the Professor. In fact, I actually like the guy. The fact is, he cant offer any substaniation of his claims other than anecdotal tales of past glory.

If you choose to believe him , thats up to you, but your decision is built on flimsy support.
 
Quote from garyjohn:

One should never stoop to such a bar room brawl type level when discussing strategy. You are lacking the very thing your name says you are...logic. The one who makes the claims needs to defend them, not the one critical of the claims. This is debate 101--- you must have missed this one in school.
No matter how you twist things, its still YOU that have failed to provide ANYTHING other than anecdotal tales of success and pretty chart art after the fact.
What's so hard about posting calls here, or your magical charts that tell the future, just like you showed the imaginary ivy professor? You can and wont do it, instead you hurl counter challenges. Anyone with any sense can see this--- Post it or dont. and I bet you cant.

Nothing to prove here Davey. I'm crazy remember.

I trade what I do quite successfully and profitably. You tell me I can't. There in lay the rub. I don't care whether you believe me or not. I can prove it but unless there is something in it for me (like rubbing your nose in your stupidity and arrogance) it's not worth my time. Go promote your marginal hedge funds and following Vic around with your nose up his butt refusing any original thought of your own, doesn't bother me. People have been successfully fading your calls for years and they will continue from this point on.

You last sentence is all that needs to be said. You say," . . . and I bet you can't". I bet I can and did. I bet you real money which, "to date", you scurried away from the bet every single solitary time. I repeat, you try to talk a good game but can't every delivery on them.

Just a sleaze ball hack and financial promoter dragging his dead dog and pony show behind him.
 
Absolutely right (and hilarious)! He says he doesn't want to 'bet' and then says "I BET you can't"!!

:D :D

Quote from ProfLogic:



You last sentence is all that needs to be said. You say," . . . and I bet you can't". I bet I can and did. I bet you real money which, "to date", you scurried away from the bet every single solitary time. I repeat, you try to talk a good game but can't every delivery on them.

 
Quote from garyjohn:

Not in the least. There is no upside other than shaming the Prof that will come from putting up any capital. Believe it or not, I have no interest in shaming the Professor. In fact, I actually like the guy. The fact is, he cant offer any substaniation of his claims other than anecdotal tales of past glory.

If you choose to believe him , thats up to you, but your faith is built on flimsy support.

No upside to proving me wrong?
As hard as you have been at it, it would seem you would welcome the chance? I'm up for it. Why?
Because it is impossible for me to fail.
I hate gambling. I only take bets I KNOW I can win.
 
This statement is essentially admitting that he would prove you wrong and you'd lose your money. Think about it.

:)

Quote from garyjohn:


Oh wait, I need to pay to find out! :D :p :)
 
Pretty sure page 3 of this thread shows you attacking him, unprovoked. You come in demanding certain things, he said 'sure, but it will cost you some money to see' and you start whining and backpeddling.

It's simple, the guy said he doesn't CARE if you don't believe him and if he is going to take any time out of his day to show some cry baby on the internet, it's gotta be worth his while.

I, for one, do not fault the guy at all. If you really think he is FOS you'll take him up on his offer. It's that simple.

Should be a sure thing, right?

:p


Quote from garyjohn:

your one twisted cat...:D

Anyone with an edge, like he claims, has gladly shared real results in the past, as it is well known that I can easily obtain practically unlimted funding for real edge.

he doesn't have an edge, therefore resorts to name calling, threats and inane challenges instead of one iota of evidence.

Edge does exist, but not with the JH and PL's type gurus
 
TA is whatever you decide to make of it (proprietary TA)....just don't try and follow the traditional applications blindly....be creative. The mkt rewards these kinds of thinkers

:)

Quote from Brianharvey:

So if TA doesn't work,
 
Back
Top