You have lots of instruments under your management and you do charting for all of them? Or you rely on a computer to do programed technical analysis unsupervised? And inevitably, you order will move the price because you are a big player then. The noise will easily affect the tech-oriented program's decision making...
Technical analysis won't make big investor?
- Thread starter mizhael
- Start date
You have lots of instruments under your management and you do charting for all of them? Or you rely on a computer to do programed technical analysis unsupervised? And inevitably, you order will move the price because you are a big player then. The noise will easily affect the tech-oriented program's decision making...
Quote from nkhoi:
his holding
So what. As long as he has deep pocket, once the crisis is gone, he will be up again, reaping much more profit than you and me with small accounts.
The market can always stays insane for longer than you can survive; but for Warren, maybe he can survive the market insanity.
Critics of technical analysis include well-known fundamental analysts. For example, Peter Lynch once commented, "Charts are great for predicting the past." Warren Buffett has said, "I realized technical analysis didn't work when I turned the charts upside down and didn't get a different answer" and "If past history was all there was to the game, the richest people would be librarians.
tradersboredom
Guest
These 10 billion funds don't trade the float, they buy the entire company and when they do trade, they call their broker and sell by the phone to another party, it's not in the open market. They have all or nothing big blocks minimum is 25% of outstanding shares at set price or no deal. a real investor wants 100% of outstanding shares and take the company private. owing 5% or less of any company is 'minority shareholder' or silent partner in a business.