Technical Analysis Doesn't Work

[no. 22]

Jack,

I won't ignore you.
Do you know that with each new person you put on ignore you're diminishing Your Omniscience?

 

[marketsurfer]

Quote from rcanfiel:

This seems to be ProfLogic's belief system (followed from this website):
Think of what an audited record will do for your "seminars." no more "trust me, a man you do not know." You can say, "See, it works?"

You are a fellow comp sci person. YOu know that they don't put something our without vigorous testing! No project manager accepts "you say it works? Great! let's ship it!!!"

p.logic is a chef. never met a comp sci person who can't get HTML or the other things he talked about on the other thread.

audited records from an individual mean little to nothing, as one can trade 2 accounts for example and only show the auditor the winning one. In addition, the audit does not show or indicate the method used in any way.......it could be lucky guesses, someone else trading the account or whatever. i would be happy with even paper trading trades posted before the fact--- he refuses to do even this..... make your own decision


surf

 

[ProfLogic]

Quote from marketsurfer:

once you start trading real money, you will understand that "win percentage" is dwarfed by "win magnitude". regardless, no one can beat your near perfect posted/claimed record anyway.

surf

I just moved into my "real money" and I am pretty good but not perfect.
Gotta have, Faith!

 

[marketsurfer]

Quote from ProfLogic:

I just moved into my "real money" and I am pretty good but not perfect.
Gotta have, Faith!

 

[ProfLogic]

Quote from marketsurfer:

he built a following among the non-market savvy in out of the way type towns. just like the "traveling medicine shows" of yore.

no disrespect meant, its a good business and im sure these people are better off trading after learning from p.logic than before--- as they knew nothing previously.

if he would just cut out the bogus claims and statements, he would be an ok guy. he just can't compete with those on elite who actually understand the markets and the deceptions involved.



surf

You betcha . . . . .

Singapore to SIMEX traders, bankers, lawyers, corporate traders as well as new traders.
Zurich to corporate leaders, software developers, bankers and a couple of new trades.
In the US a private family hedge fund and a handful of new traders.
Then a few scattered colleges here in the US plus the local college to farmers, ranchers and other agribusiness professional. (You know the ones you call "hicks").

Yup those are some non-market savvy individuals . . . not.

 

[marketsurfer]

Quote from ProfLogic:

You betcha . . . . .

Singapore to SIMEX traders, bankers, lawyers, corporate traders as well as new traders.
Zurich to corporate leaders, software developers, bankers and a couple of new trades.
In the US a private family hedge fund and a handful of new traders.
Then a few scattered colleges here in the US plus the local college to farmers, ranchers and other agribusiness professional. (You know the ones you call "hicks").

Yup those are some non-market savvy individuals . . . not.

ok. simex traders use your method??


should be some good opps on that exchange, thanks for the heads up!

surf

 

[rcanfiel]

Quote from marketsurfer:

p.logic is a chef. never met a comp sci person who can't get HTML or the other things he talked about on the other thread.

audited records from an individual mean little to nothing, as one can trade 2 accounts for example and only show the auditor the winning one. In addition, the audit does not show or indicate the method used in any way.......it could be lucky guesses, someone else trading the account or whatever. i would be happy with even paper trading trades posted before the fact--- he refuses to do even this..... make your own decision


surf

When I meant audited returns, I certainly don't mean things HE controls! I mean Timertrac type audited!!!!

And wasn't Proffy supposed to be out until next Wednesday with his house? He was very adamant in spelling this out to us. Now he can't read a calendar?

And, does he seem to be ignoring the past few pages?

 

[buzz]

If you wait until you have all the data you need before acting upon it, by the time that action has come to fruition, you'll be well behind other people.

 

[marketsurfer]

Quote from rcanfiel:

When I meant audited returns, I certainly don't mean things HE controls! I mean Timertrac type audited!!!!



And, does he seem to be ignoring the past few pages?

makes sense, i thought you were refering to CPA type audits.

it makes no sense that he will not submit to any realtime testing or examples of his work. highly suspicious in my opinion.

remember, this is a guy who at one time claimed to be getting a patent on his system.

surf

 

[rcanfiel]

Quote from marketsurfer:

makes sense, i thought you were refering to CPA type audits.

it makes no sense that he will not submit to any realtime testing or examples of his work. highly suspicious in my opinion.

remember, this is a guy who at one time claimed to be getting a patent on his system.

surf

Why would he patent something that he is so afraid to just trade in public? In the old days, at least the Eureka vacuum salesman would demo by cleaning your carpet.

Proffy will only try to show it has validity for $50K-$80K. That is a hell of an expensive sales pitch.

I don't know why he is so afraid of being found out as all talk and no walk. That is about the only explanation left for his bizarre demands.