Quote from Spydertrader:
Why again, do you (either of you) refuse to accept his challenge if you both appear to believe with every fiber in your being that he is a fraud? And this time please, no tap dance lesson.
The tap dancer is the professor:
- does not get independently monitored, yet offers multiple services to the public.
- posts falsified track records, based on the way-too-perfect personal track record on his site
- has bailed on past challenges, like he is bailing on this one.
- has many past ET posts of people who saw through his smoke and mirrors and called him out on it.
- no one in their right mind would expect to actually collect from a con artist (see following reply), regardless of the escrow service or guarantor used. He would be happy to collect, but he would again weasel out in some way.
- or the Professor using wild position sizing methods to win, out of luck.
- or if he loses, to find reasons to keep extending until he noses ahead. Or like Hershey, the 26% loss Jack seemed to have had when he pulled out early from a challenge.
The $50,000 or $80,000 is a smoke screen. The Prof puts up a big number to bluff out people. The simple truth is, he cannot just trade publicly and prove that his offerings have any value. He appears to charge $4000+ apiece for his seminars. For crying out loud, the least he can do is go on the record for a reasonable period of time and show he is not full of it.
PROFLOGIC - PROVE YOURSELF AND STOP THROWING UP DISTRACTIONS!!!!! ANYTHING LESS IS WEASELING OUT!
I expect him to put myself and Surf on ignore soon. That is the Hershey method. That way, he can pretend to be deaf to further
I will reply below, with the full text of the PM I received. I truncated it previously, because I have little interest in scoring political points by the bottom part of the message. But this person was angry as a hornet after being taken in by one of "Prof's" seminar. The Prof's demands are pretty much of an indicator he is afraid just to prove himself for once.
