Technical Analysis = CRAP

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote from NoDoji:

:D :D

That was definitely my epiphany and it took me sooo long to believe in it. I had an ongoing irrational fear that the day I actually traded all my valid technical setups, they'd stop working.

Now after I put on the trade that I'm certain cannot possibly work yet again (because technical analysis is crap), I end up shaking my head and thinking, "I can't believe it worked again" as my target order is lifted.

Trading a solid edge effectively is the ultimate test of faith, IMHO.

Amen!
 
Quote from Fireplace:

Same with mine, because it's not based on some inefficiency that the mkt can wipe out but rather natural mkt tendencies that repeat everyday, across all time frames. I chose this path for that very reason and I'm thinking you did the same. :)

I can only imagine we did.

Great ideas aren't born in a vacuum.
 
Quote from Rodney King:

The curious can Google the phrase, "The seminars will be private weeklong discussions held" ...

I wish I still looked like that.
Doing speaking engagements for free was tiring but informative.
That was almost 8 years ago and right after I taught my first class.
 
Curious, has anyone been able to take whatever gems of technical analysis goodness has been sprinkled upon us during this odyssey of a thread and made any money from it ?

If it takes 139 pages to highjack a thread and explain one's trading model ...
 
Quote from bone:

Curious, has anyone been able to take whatever gems of technical analysis goodness has been sprinkled upon us during this odyssey of a thread and made any money from it ?

If it takes 139 pages to highjack a thread and explain one's trading model ...

That depends on whether or not they know what gems look like, and if they can put them in the right order to fit their individual psychological profile.
 
Quote from bone:

If it takes 139 pages to highjack a thread and explain one's trading model ...

hijack?

Forums
›› Technically Speaking
›› Technical Analysis
›› Technical Analysis = CRAP

I would assume a discussion on whether TA is crap or not would include examples of potential systems that would fall into the "non-crap" categories. Just like it should include systems that are crap. Most good, reasonable and adult discussions I've ever been involved in are a balance of both sides of that question.
 
Quote from ProfLogic:

I wish I still looked like that. That was almost 8 years ago

Isn't that same ancient pic used on your Twitter feed? There must be professional fotogs -- even in Ohio -- who could re-shoot you? :confused:
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

That depends on whether or not they know what gems look like, and if they can put them in the right order to fit their individual psychological profile.


My brother, an objective system should be removed from psychology issues. Unless there are serious wealth wounds with the users and/or terrified money--- this psych stuff like I have read in this thread---doesnt make sense to me.

In addition there is only one right order to an objective system. Otherwise, it's not objective.
 
Quote from Rodney King:

Isn't that same ancient pic used on your Twitter feed? There must be professional fotogs -- even in Ohio -- who could re-shoot you? :confused:

No, different pic I think but it doesn't matter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top