Any choice is self-imposed. Both have utility and are informative when viewed at the correct time.
What is the correct time?
To answer that question involves building distinctions one at a time from a wholistic perspective and methodical diligence starting at the basic granularity of market data - ie. How does a single bar build?
The set is finite and is composed of 25 variations.
When that set is compared and contrasted to the next bar, then there is a structural relationship that can be discerned through the pairs finite permutations. The bar pairs occur on both increasing and decreasing volume.
It’s work that has no shortcut and requires thinking to accomplish which most are unwilling to do. Until that work is done much time one will squander. Many attempt it just by the brute force of spending time in front of a screen, another might approach it through statistics, or trying a secession of indicators, charting platforms, etc, upon failing conclude that the thing itself at fault instead of their own misapplication of effort.
Observing market granularity all starts as noise and it can all become signal with the right mindset.
Very interesting. Can you recommend some actual reading to build such mindset without doing brute force? Is it correct that it's completely possible, one only have to find the right approach?