Originally posted by dottom
NihabaAshi,
Although I am a big advocate of proving your trading method first, (so in Tampa's case he should only be paper trading or trading just one contract) I do know exactly what Tampa is talking about.
I used to play poker professionally (i.e. made my living by playing poker) before I started trading. As my income, savings, and net worth grew, now I just can't enjoy playing poker anymore. Even the $15-30 holdem games don't really get my attention.
Same is true for going to Vegas. 10 years ago I would be very engaged betting $25 on BJ. But now I'd have to bet $500 to get my attention. In other words I don't gamble anymore because I don't believe in risking $20-30k with a negative expectation; and playing with a smaller stake is just boring.
Maybe Tampa is in the same boat. Based on his net worth and experience, trading just one contract doesn't float his boat. I.e. imagine having a $200k trading account (with more in networth and savings) and "learning" to trade with 100 share lots or just 1 emini contract. If you are a rigorous student you and believe in proving your method works then you will be diligent. But for many discretionary traders they don't "feel the burn" unless the share size is the proper amount.