I wanted to get some feedback from others regarding a semi-abstract scenario. Before jumping into the reaction pool of "gold will go this way, this is right, this is wrong", please take the time to read this post in full.
The primary goal is to see how people would invest $2k to $4k if they were confident that gold would experience a 35% increase in price over the next 18 months. The exact timing is unknown, but it would be within that timeframe. The objective is to take advantage of such a scenario while still controlling risk. With that being set, let's set some parameters for answers so the conversion is more fruitful:
Objective:
- If you were confident that gold would experience a 35% increase within the next 18 months, how would you invest $2k - $4k? Why this approach? How does this approach address risk/reward balance?
Major thing to avoid:
- Discussing if gold will actually go up or not. This is an exploration of strategy to take advantage of a long bias - not an exploration of the validity of the long bias itself. I understand that this might seem out of the norm for some to detach, but let's please try to keep this in mind.
- Certain answers may seem absurd to others, but being open to the possibility of absurd dialect is more fruitful to innovation then being closed off to it; from absurdity often stems valuable information. With that being said, let's be respectful of the differing opinions.
The primary goal is to see how people would invest $2k to $4k if they were confident that gold would experience a 35% increase in price over the next 18 months. The exact timing is unknown, but it would be within that timeframe. The objective is to take advantage of such a scenario while still controlling risk. With that being set, let's set some parameters for answers so the conversion is more fruitful:
Objective:
- If you were confident that gold would experience a 35% increase within the next 18 months, how would you invest $2k - $4k? Why this approach? How does this approach address risk/reward balance?
Major thing to avoid:
- Discussing if gold will actually go up or not. This is an exploration of strategy to take advantage of a long bias - not an exploration of the validity of the long bias itself. I understand that this might seem out of the norm for some to detach, but let's please try to keep this in mind.
- Certain answers may seem absurd to others, but being open to the possibility of absurd dialect is more fruitful to innovation then being closed off to it; from absurdity often stems valuable information. With that being said, let's be respectful of the differing opinions.