Thanks all for your concern. Like I mentioned, the key for me is cutting off the blunders (trades that I make which are violations of my well-defined strategies. My average size is consistent with the drawdown I anticipated when starting this thread. It is the costs due to bad habits (averaging down/chasing without basis) that accentuates the drawdown. Yes, it would make sense to cut size while bringing the bad habits under control, but then when I fall to bad habits, intended sizing doesn't really matter.
We shall see.Quote from lescor:
....At this rate your journal will be done before year end, because you'll be out of money.
That's right. My sizing is based on percentage of current balance. So a 10% loss on balance ten times in a row (heaven forbid!) does not lead to a wipeout (100% loss).Quote from Daal:
ever heard of reducing your position size in a drawdown?there is nothing wrong with his position sizing if you think about it. all he is doing is increasing his drawdowns in order to reach higher returns. as a long its conservatively lower than 60%dd there should be no risk of ruin, the fluctuations will be huge but thats the price you pay
Targets are a good thing. It shows what is achievable and keeps me focused on doing what is necessary to attain that.Quote from reid5525:
lescor is right. cut down on position size and have fun fine tuning the strategy. forget the 500k, it is beyond your reach for now. the trading strategy is the key.
if you don't do that losses and frustration will cause you to quit very soon, not knowing what could have been.
Hmmm...Quote from midlifeguy:
Swing for the fences...$500,000 is only a couple big trades away!