Quote from verbotenlaandia:
I guess the question that I have is: if you feel you can continue to duplicate your recent trading history indefinitely, then what did you start doing differently on 2/25 when you started this thread? Why weren't you already worth 126 billion dollars? You could have gotten there in a handful of years at those monthly return rates.
A few weeks ago, you would have thought the chance of hitting your goal was over 50%, until you hit a major drawdown. Since then, you've identified two new rules that you'll follow going forward. One thing to think of, that I wouldn't know the answer to is: before your bad week, how much of your gains came from trades that broke your two commandments, but just happened to work out in your favor? I'm suggesting that there could be more trades that you could have put on that showed you big gains, but if done thousands of times, would put you in the red. I'm not trying to crap in your patch, but am suggesting that it isn't reasonable to expect monthly returns of 47% or even 19% over an extended period of time. Even if you had an edge that could give you those numbers, it probably would eventually be identified by others and whittled away.
Verbotenlaandia,
Thanks for your questions. First off, I have never claimed I will be able to duplicate my recent trading history indefinitely. Moreover, I do not know how you came to 126billion starting from 76K. Over how many years? I did set a target for 2/25/2007-12/31/2007 based on my opening balance and what I felt was achievable. I fully understand that trading 100billion is not the same as trading 76K. I will not buy 9000 shares of a stock that trades 200 shares/day for a day-trade neither will I buy 10million shares of a stock that trades 1million shares/day for a day-trade, assuming I had the money. So please keep things in perspective and the comments rational.
If you read my prior posts (which I believe you have), I mentioned not keeping to rules as keeping me behind. What I committed to do differently on 2/25/2007 was a stricter commitment to keeping the rules, reinforced again after last week's blow. How much of my gains comes from disobeying my rules? Compared to the losses over a longer time-frame they are insignificant (I have analysed that before over a prior period based on real trading results).
Well, edges do come and go, but it behoves the trader to keep innovating, and make maximum advantage of the edge before it goes away. I have not set an expectation of 19% per month - or whatever it comes to - over the next 50 years, only till 12/31/2007. After that I shall see what the balance is, what my edge looks like, and decide what the next realistic target should be. Part of the reason for posting my results is to develop some form of accountability and reason to keep focused on doing what is right to achieve the target, besides providing an interesting reading and maybe challenging someone to become better at trading. I have mentioned before in 2005 I took 15K to 135K January to December. In 2006 started with $135K, made 126K and took out 170K to fund a capital project and pay taxes; my option trading in 2006 was a net loss of 188K, excluding that I should have made a much better result. I have set the current target based on what I felt is achievable: if I fail to hit it, whether because of loss of edge or bad money management, I will have nothing to regret. Companies do set revenue and earnings targets based on what they think is achievable and go about to realise it: it is not an ego display, neither are they crucified if they fail to achieve it.
I have taken this liberty to address your questions, and I hope we keep the diatribe rational and civil.
