G
geneticien
Something is wrong here.
You said "i never compound, because i feel most comfortable at the current amount. it can handle much much more though." and this does make any sense if you DD is 2%.
Then on "If so, you're results are faulty and highly optimistic vs reality" which seemed like the guy believes that you showed just backtesting, you reply " know the back test result is not accurate, but it is suffice to demonstrate the model has positive expectancy.". Why would you reply that way if as you claimed you traded it since 2008 and had real profits and paid 1.5M to IB?
You say that you don't compound but you are looking for bil. AUM.
Did you actually trade it or only backtested and you are looking for an investor?
You said "i never compound, because i feel most comfortable at the current amount. it can handle much much more though." and this does make any sense if you DD is 2%.
Then on "If so, you're results are faulty and highly optimistic vs reality" which seemed like the guy believes that you showed just backtesting, you reply " know the back test result is not accurate, but it is suffice to demonstrate the model has positive expectancy.". Why would you reply that way if as you claimed you traded it since 2008 and had real profits and paid 1.5M to IB?
You say that you don't compound but you are looking for bil. AUM.
Did you actually trade it or only backtested and you are looking for an investor?
