Quote from marketsurfer:
Nice to see you, Jem. It's not only harder now, it's become purely a game of chance daytrading via price action alone.
The paper is 14 years old, man, based on data 30 to 50 years old------ it's completely outdated and not relevant to modern markets. Is that all the TA folks have?
Peace,
surf
Very few academic research papers about TA have been written since 2009 that shows stats of TA working or TA not working. Maybe folks getting doctorate find other interesting topics to write about since the financial crisis of 2008.

You can still find new stuff via in-depth Google search via keywords like "technical analysis thesis", "empirical evidence thesis" involving markets I'm sure you don't trade (e.g. cocoa futures, Hang Seng futures, DAX futures. bond yields) and many other markets you don't normally see discussed at forums like Elitetrader.com
I find interesting is the footnotes of these articles that leads to other articles by academia. That raises questions, some articles support the merits of TA but their testing are on markets that most typical retail traders do not trade (e.g. cocoa futures).
1) If someone applies the same statistical studies to another market like Emini ES futures and determines there's no merits to whatever TA was being tested...does that imply some markets can be traded profitably via some types of TA while other types of markets can not be traded profitably via the exact same TA. ?
2) If the goal is to make money and someone wants to use TA as part of their trading plan...shouldn't the trader than trade a market that benefits from the application of TA even though the market isn't popular amongst retail traders (e.g. wheat futures, treasury futures). ?
Retail traders tend to trade whatever they can get cheap commissions, low margins, low cost data feeds and whatever is popular discussion amongst other retail traders (e.g. Emini ES futures).
3) Why is it that most of these articles are written from countries outside of North America ?
Just a few questions I want to throw out there especially since Google.com is not difficult to use to find these academic articles.
By the way, there are websites like those by Thomas Bulkowski that maintain live (current) stats on TA. You have been given direct link to that website in this thread and in past years debates...without any commentary from you unless I missed it.