TA - Objective or Psychological Skill?

Thomas Bulkowski is one of the few out there that maintains "live" statistics of TA patterns in primarily stocks.

Yet, don't misunderstand his use of TA. He does not use it alone. He's into fundamental analysis, diversification, money management, position size management and many other things you'll typically see in a profitable trader's trading plan.

I highly recommend anyone venturing into TA to get some of his books to help them be better prepared to use technical analysis.
 
Quote from wrbtrader:

Thomas Bulkowski is one of the few out there that maintains "live" statistics of TA patterns in primarily stocks.

Yet, don't misunderstand his use of TA. He does not use it alone. He's into fundamental analysis, diversification, money management, position size management and many other things you'll typically see in a profitable trader's trading plan.

I highly recommend anyone venturing into TA to get some of his books to help them be better prepared to use technical analysis.

You're very right about it of course. TA alone is not a recipe for success. Patterns are just points to enter and maybe exit (not always), but there are other elements in the successful trading too.
 
The statistical tests are based on the bootstrap technique
(Efron 1979, 1982), a nonparametric method frequently used
to evaluate technical trading strategies (Brock et al. 1992;
Levich and Thomas 1993). To implement the tests, I compare
the behavior of exchange rates upon reaching published
support and resistance levels with the behavior upon reaching
10,000 sets of arbitrarily chosen support and resistance levels.
If the outcome associated with the actual levels exceeds the
average outcome for the arbitrary levels in a high proportion of
months, I conclude that the published levels have significant
predictive power.

http://www.ny.frb.org/research/epr/00v06n2/0007osle.pdf


Quote from cornix:

Yea, but somehow certain "academics" disagree. I wonder what's their methodology of testing they don't see the obvious.


In short this the finding is the ultimate in the surf crushing argument.

Not only did the Fed find T/A real.... they found that it was even self fulfilling exactly the point made by t/a people.

If enough people look at levels those levels become non random.
 
Quote from wrbtrader:

I don't know any thing about wiz trade red/green light TA system other than to say I think you're talking about something that's an "automated system". I don't use any automation trading system.

By the way, if its an automated trading system...wouldn't the programmer input money management rules into the automation along with other variables like position size management ???

Yet, I do know that there are professional firms using automation or algos to make profits. Can retail traders do the same via wiz trade...I don't know. Is it an algo program ???

WizeTrade has the money management rule built into it.
 
Quote from cornix:

You're very right about it of course. TA alone is not a recipe for success. Patterns are just points to enter and maybe exit (not always), but there are other elements in the successful trading too.
Agreed, although someone mentioning they only use TA doesn't necessarily mean they use no money management as has been suggested.
 
Quote from Mr Super Trader:

To keep things simple with an even risk reward you just need to have slightly over a 50% win ratio to cover commissions. This with high frequency trading and the combination of compounding can be highly successful.

Keep looking under that pillow, surely the tooth fairy is due soon for your neighborhood.

Please explain how well compounding works in a game of chance after you increased the bet about 5 fold.

At best compounding works when your money is doing a slow death for "PPP" as the dollar sits in a bank or some other interest account.

HFT is a myth for small traders just like the tooth fairy and Santa is for children. :eek:
 
I often use a Trader Vic pattern for price action entries around key areas such as trend lines, channel lines, 20EMA, etc.

Because I use a specific pattern in a smaller time frame to trigger my entries, whether my trend lines or channel lines exactly match up with someone else's doesn't matter. A few ticks here or there is noise. It's the big picture that matters.
 
Quote from NoDoji:

I often use a Trader Vic pattern for price action entries around key areas such as trend lines, channel lines, 20EMA, etc.

Because I use a specific pattern in a smaller time frame to trigger my entries, whether my trend lines or channel lines exactly match up with someone else's doesn't matter. A few ticks here or there is noise. It's the big picture that matters.


Besides if your trend, channel lines etc. matched exactly with everyone else than others will take out your stops routinely.
 
Back
Top