T. Rowe, Fidelity Score Green Light for ETFs That Hide Holdings
- Thread starter Banjo
- Start date
Chronicles of Paranormal Activity - Season one - Episode :
Bloomberg
(green line at the top ,,Exclusive offer'' , - yes, yes, exclusive indeed.)
Folks aren't doing well with math either,
12 x $1.99 per month, - $23.88 per year, with refunds & option to cancel,
or
$340 per year - without refunds.
(Can't decide which one to choose, gonna contact the client service)
Honestly, if that's a life long subscription, that is paid once, they should make it more clear. Unless that extra ,, * '' indicates that (?)
,,But it remains unclear whether retail investors will adopt the model over traditional ETFs that keep their holdings public.''
How many of them - check out those holdings...?
5% - 10% ?
Then, how many of them know what is BETA and exposure ?
0.5% - 1% ?
I mean, such ETF, with good marketing, still should be able, to attract as much as 70%-90% of attention, comparing with usual/open/visible/unlocked ETFs ;
people who buy those ETFs - they don't care about the holdings that much.
They look at returns and fees.
If you would place, in a front of simple average Joe (retailer), 10 choices for ETFs & 5 of those would be absolute trash, while 3 decent & 2 good ones, what would be the chances, that he would end up with the best two...
My point is , that they will adopt.
They adopted Bitconnect, they will adopt this as well...
Warrens suggestion, to make earnings not quarterly , but yearly, so the CEOs and Directors board, wouldn't suffer that much of ,,stress''.
That was something.
Bloomberg
(green line at the top ,,Exclusive offer'' , - yes, yes, exclusive indeed.)
Folks aren't doing well with math either,
12 x $1.99 per month, - $23.88 per year, with refunds & option to cancel,
or
$340 per year - without refunds.
(Can't decide which one to choose, gonna contact the client service)
Honestly, if that's a life long subscription, that is paid once, they should make it more clear. Unless that extra ,, * '' indicates that (?)
,,But it remains unclear whether retail investors will adopt the model over traditional ETFs that keep their holdings public.''
How many of them - check out those holdings...?
5% - 10% ?
Then, how many of them know what is BETA and exposure ?
0.5% - 1% ?
I mean, such ETF, with good marketing, still should be able, to attract as much as 70%-90% of attention, comparing with usual/open/visible/unlocked ETFs ;
people who buy those ETFs - they don't care about the holdings that much.
They look at returns and fees.
If you would place, in a front of simple average Joe (retailer), 10 choices for ETFs & 5 of those would be absolute trash, while 3 decent & 2 good ones, what would be the chances, that he would end up with the best two...
My point is , that they will adopt.
They adopted Bitconnect, they will adopt this as well...
Warrens suggestion, to make earnings not quarterly , but yearly, so the CEOs and Directors board, wouldn't suffer that much of ,,stress''.
That was something.
Last edited: