PS-- DB. You should give credit to authors, like larry phillips from whom your above post came from.
I have, many times.
PS-- DB. You should give credit to authors, like larry phillips from whom your above post came from.
You do understand though that this has nothing to do with him taking his trade early at 936 correct?The funniest thing to realize is if these folks were presented with completely random charts ( within market parameter random, of course). This same breathless descriptive diatribe would be occuring about the "action". Man, this is the wrong way to approach the market and shows faulty thinking. I pray for your accounts. Please rethink for your own sake. Peace. Surf
PS-- DB. You should give credit to authors, like larry phillips from whom your above post came from.
the markets not random buys & sells. this is not a coin flip, but lot more complexity. may feel random, and oft times HFT skews we that trade on the 'macro'. but never randomThe funniest thing to realize is if these folks were presented with completely random charts ( within market parameter random, of course). This same breathless descriptive diatribe would be occuring about the "action". Man, this is the wrong way to approach the market and shows faulty thinking. I pray for your accounts. Please rethink for your own sake. Peace. Surf
PS-- DB. You should give credit to authors, like larry phillips from whom your above post came from.

this first time i posted here,and when i did i said your market is not random. i'd think you like that. we DO have that in common,right?As much as the attention to my journal is great, I wish those who participated would stay on topic - MY choice of topic. I'm trying to trade via Price Action, AMT and SLA.
B1S2 and artemstreb have VERY different approaches than I do so while I wish you luck with your trading endeavors, the commentary is quite distracting for me and interrupts the flow of my journal.


Yes, my postings were/are on topic. I have been trying to help you see that by using your level as defined by SLA, you were just a tad early at the 936 time with the long. Your analysis of a long there was correct. However, if anyone posts charts of the time frame they will probably show where the trade should have been made--about 6 minutes later. You were not late to the trade at all. If you take a trade early like that, you'll just need to use a larger stop since you don't know yet how far the market will move yet below the defined level. Your best interests at heart--IshmaelAs much as the attention to my journal is great, I wish those who participated would stay on topic - MY choice of topic. I'm trying to trade via Price Action, AMT and SLA.
B1S2 and artemstreb have VERY different approaches than I do so while I wish you luck with your trading endeavors, the commentary is quite distracting for me and interrupts the flow of my journal.
I appreciate your take on my trade. However, I'm not interested in increasing my stop level at this time and you can't/won't/don't seem to understand that. We differ on our approach and that's just how it is. As I stated before, best of luck to you. Please refrain from continuing to state your opinion of how I should trade with regard to stops in my journal --- your opinion has been noted.Yes, my postings were/are on topic. I have been trying to help you see that by using your level as defined by SLA, you were just a tad early at the 936 time with the long. Your analysis of a long there was correct. However, if anyone posts charts of the time frame they will probably show where the trade should have been made--about 6 minutes later. You were not late to the trade at all. If you take a trade early like that, you'll just need to use a larger stop since you don't know yet how far the market will move yet below the defined level. Your best interests at heart--Ishmael