I am referring to historically in the U.S. - since kidnappings here are very rare nowadays - and in countries (mostly third world) where it is still prevalent.
We all know the outcome for women here in U.S. or anywhere else, that has nothing to do with money but control, is a extremely high outcome rate of death.
As for henry's point think the 4th 9-11 airplane. Didn't work but still. Anyway it is another one of these debates that has no definitive outcome to put to.
Kidnappings in developing countries are a totally different thing. Same with historical times.
the 4th 911 plane guys (“let’s roll”) called it right. Most hijackings end up largely okay. (As okay as a hijacking can end).
Anyhow this is not a clear and cut answer and I’m not surprised we have different ways of looking at it now and I’m sure our views of looking at it would differ in the actual situation and after an actual event (assuming we are still alive).
To bring this back to trading: how do our views on how to handle a kidnapper reflect our views on portfolio risk management?