I do not trade at the moment (used to be a simple stocks trader), but currently am reading up on options.Good question @trade4succes
The answer is not binary.
I looked at volatility in some detail some time ago and couldn't find a bankable edge that I could exploit from trading volatility alone (*). My directional calls generally seem to be pretty good - although not so much this week!
My strategies / methodologies:
Do you trade similarly? I would welcome your thoughts.
- Directional (swing) trades ising vertical spreads further away from AtM are more purely directional, and relative volatility doesn't have a huge impact
- where possible - depending on skew etc - I bring the short side in closer to AtM to harvest gains from excess volatility risk premium, as you put it.
- the body for Butterflies can be far OtM or closer to AtM for similar reasons and also depending on my estimated / target return
- Calendars are much more dependent on Vol movement and there would be little point in trading them without exploiting the relative impact of IV across respective expiration terms.
- (*) Outside of this journal I do a couple of other things, including a 'no brainer' momentum strategy on individual equities to participate in changes in volatility over a month or two, which makes a useful profit vs the work involved but is not a particularly interesting discussion to put on a forum.
My current understanding is (nothing new for you I am sure, unless I am wrong), that 1) delta one/outright strategies are a subset of option strategies, where the market is modeled as a Bernoulli distribution with instantaneous implied 50/50 probabilities (actually a bit skewed to the upside because of cost of capital). If the trader believes that the market is over/underestimating the upside probability, she goes short/long. Time isn't even important here, because if a long term trader thinks the odds are bearish short term, and long term bullish, she should go short now and go long later (abstracting away from possible liquidity/transaction cost and similar issues).
With 2) option trading, one imagines the option prices determine an implied continuous distribution over the expected price, with a time dimension added. If the trader at a certain time believes the markets odds are wrong in whatever dimension, she can set up an options position to profit from it.
Now, the reason I asked you, is because some academic articles suggest that options (at least on stock indices, and possibly others) are perennially overpriced on average (premium versus risk, i.e. implied versus realized volatility). Reading that made me wonder whether that edge is the cornerstone of all option traders, where specific situation-dependent implementations of trades are tailored as a sort of money management tool to make the harvesting operation as efficient as possible.
I understood from your answer there is no black and white answer to that, and you employ a rather fluid sort of strategy. If I were to start trading again, I would be tempted to believe the academics on face value and zero in on the allegedly overpriced premiums, but that would probably be too easy to make a good living. Because that would be similar as just always be short VIX (which, I am speculating here, doesn't do much better than a risk adjusted return of long the S&P). So my tentative conclusion is that there still is no holy grail, and all the better. Thanks for your answer, and good trading!

