Quote from frostengine:
Considering how many funds exists that do not even out perform their target benchmark such as the S&P, I place a high value on simply outperforming.
To judge the success of this method requires looking at a lot of variables:
#1 Does it outperform simply buy and hold the benchmark index
#2 Evaluate the relationship of returns versus draw down compared to the benchmark returns/draw down
#3 Amount of capital required to trade compared to buy and hold.
My strategy is not meant to be a get rich quick scheme or return 100's of % a year. It is meant to be a solid strategy that is capable of outperforming the S&P over the long run and in return outperforming many of the funds out there.
I take it this is not your day job? Because if you trade for a living, you cannot survive by simply beating the s&p 500. Those guys that you mention that under perform the s&p 500 have one thing you don't have, a management fee.
If this is not your day job then fine, I guess whatever return satisfies you is all that matters. But the title of your thread is a little misleading. This is far from a holy grail.
