Your stats also show that it's statistically possible to make more than 100% per month.This is from my research using real market data of last week Thursday (2022-09-15):
It means there are more than 216 spread trade candidates that have a MonthlyMaxPnL >= 30% if the price of the underlying stays constant (just a convention to make trades comparable to each other).Code:# Mon distr: # >100.00%: 1 1 # > 95.00%: 0 1 # > 90.00%: 1 2 # > 85.00%: 1 3 # > 80.00%: 0 3 # > 75.00%: 0 3 # > 70.00%: 0 3 # > 65.00%: 1 4 # > 60.00%: 1 5 # > 55.00%: 2 7 # > 50.00%: 7 14 # > 45.00%: 9 23 # > 40.00%: 21 44 # > 35.00%: 51 95 # > 30.00%: 121 216 # > 25.00%: 256 472 # > 20.00%: 834 1306 # > 15.00%: 1029 2335 # > 10.00%: 4068 6403 # > 5.00%: 14538 20941 # > 0.00%: 32850 53791
Of course it's not a guaranteed outcome, but a good estimate that it's possible to achieve 30% per month, if done right together with all the other things said (diversification, automation etc.)
The above table is about 2-leg vertical Put spreads only, not even including the 2-leg calender spreads yet, meaning there are even more such candidates out there.
The result looks similar at any time during market hours. Ie. there are enough candidates available every day at any time of the day.
So, what's your point?
