That is absolutely not what I said.
Bloomberg is more or less center.
Breitbart - extreme right
Fox - right
CNN - left
NYTimes - left
WashPost - I never read it, but based on info I hear from others either left or extreme left, not sure.
Susan Rice: CNN vs FOX
- Thread starter RedDuke
- Start date
That is absolutely not what I said.
Bloomberg is more or less center.
Breitbart - extreme right
Fox - right
CNN - left
NYTimes - left
WashPost - I never read it, but based on info I hear from others either left or extreme left, not sure.
I don't understand the criticism of CNN. They covered the Rice story. Their coverage was even-handed.
What stands out is that the likes of Fox will give Trump all manner of passes while dragging Democrats through mud at the drop of a hat.
Rather than waiting for both situations to play out and then draw a conclusion, the right wing media, more so than the left or centrist media, offer premature, slanted conclusions.
What stands out is that the likes of Fox will give Trump all manner of passes while dragging Democrats through mud at the drop of a hat.
Rather than waiting for both situations to play out and then draw a conclusion, the right wing media, more so than the left or centrist media, offer premature, slanted conclusions.
This is easy to figure out. The leftist media will continue the slow walk because the facts blow up their narrative of the grand Trump-Russia conspiracy. Should that fabrication wilt under the light of day, they are then forced, again, to try and explain the humiliating defeat suffered by Clinton, and that truth is a bone crusher for them. The truth, the cold hard truth, is had they run ANYONE other than Clinton there would be a democrat in the White House right now. The ACA would remain in tact with a few changes, and the big one is that right now at this very moment we'd be reading about the soon to be appointed left leaning Supreme Court Justice who would be replacing the very conservative seat held by the late Anthony Scalia, Ginsburg would be announcing retirement to be replaced by a another leftist, thereby changing the entire dynamic of the court for years to come. Believe me, that is what has them in a twist. They lost the opportunity to change the court, and all because they colluded to nominate a hack like Clinton.
The so-called "leftist media" (I assume you mean the MSM) just want to get the facts, whatever they may be. It's the Rightsters who have already exonerated Trump and indicted Rice without all of the facts firmly in place.
i would agree but add that the New york times and Washington post used to try to remove some of the bias from their articles. Now they are American versions of the Guardian newspaper ( british) - or Guardinista as it commonly known.
This is the issue with liberals. MSM just want to get the facts is absolutely not true. That is your perception and that is the problem.
Did you read the below post?
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/susan-rice-cnn-vs-fox.308280/#post-4435997
Bullshit. You're the guys with your ready-made conclusions. Investigations are only a waste of time when they're focused on Republicans and forgone conclusions when they're directed at Democrats. Utter hypocrisy.
Okay; do you think that Trump or his associates colluded with Russia?