Surf's Special Situation Journal

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote from marketsurfer:

Professor Hershey... If you could really trade, you will take the challenge, that's the bottom line. surf

I'm not a fan of Hershey and his bragging but your statement is false. The contest looks like it's just a game and not everyone likes to play games especially ones that cost $200 to play.
 
Quote from NoDoji:

Understood.

You have been pwned, no doji. You simply can't compete with those of us who really trade maybe go back to wannabes and dreamers. They eat your stuff up for some reason. .

It's probably best you don't expose yourself any more by taking the combine.

I'm a nice guy and not a social Darwinist, so have no interest in seeing hershey or you prove my point.
 
Quote from NoDoji:

I don't even know what "9-10x annual" means.

I did once make a point that an experienced CL price action trader can easily average 40 ticks a day ($400/contract less comm/slip), and since one need only have a $10K account to trade one contract, that someone with a $10K account could generate close to a $100K annually. If that's what you mean, then yes I said that, and I stand by that.

Would you like me to share the magic secret holy grail with you, or do you prefer that I compete in the combine first and prove myself before you give me permission to do that?

On the hindsight charts, anything is possible! Why not show us in the Combine? Wait, that's in real time , here come the excuses....
 
Quote from sellindexvol66:

prove these guys wrong..post a few trader p/l and really show these guys.

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=233960


Go on the combine and prove us wrong. Otherwise too much room for chicanery.

Just like nodojis great call she just bragged about earlier, untill it was exposed as totally bogus by Atticus. Seriously, nothing wrong with pretend, just understand the difference between pretending and reality. Surf
 
Quote from atticus:

Do whatever you like. I am here for the entertainment. I sincerely doubt you are year-end profitable, let alone this 10-100k nonsense. You can keep the Grail, but thanks for the generous offer. You've already begged-off on the Combine, so I don't quite get the tease.

All Tucsonians are year beginning, middle and end profitable.

They can be seen dining with their programmers at the "Blue Willow" or TTT, occasionally. Look for a bunch of 18 wheelers at TTT.
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

Go on the combine and prove us wrong. Otherwise too much room for chicanery.

Just like nodojis great call she just bragged about earlier, untill it was exposed as totally bogus by Atticus. Seriously, nothing wrong with pretend, just understand the difference between pretending and reality. Surf

Pal, i make no claims other than blotter posts.

suffice to say i don't need to mentor, need backing or prove anything.

i do like to point out if any of you guys had an edge you would not need posture as you do.
 
In case anyone cares, here is today's verified and confirmed results using the Price Drivers:

30xg5jk.jpg
 
Quote from sellindexvol66:

prove these guys wrong..post a few trader p/l and really show these guys.

I posted daily in the P/L threads starting from when I was a rank beginner, July 2008, and continued posting into 2010.

I called trades live in ET's old chat room, then called trades in Robert Weinstein's chat room when ET's room went down, then called trades live in CL Redux and ES Journal, then spent 6 hours a day with other ET traders on Skype, developing my current trading methods and calling trades all day, then I've shared with quite a few ET-ers my trading methods via Skype since then.

Cornixforex, another professional retail technical price action trader, knows me from the 2008 ET chat days as well as 2010/2011 Skype sessions and if these TA methods didn't work, surely there would've been a stretch of time in all those different market conditions where the tactics failed. But so far they haven't failed, because they're based on price movement and the only way that fails is if liquidity dries up and price fails to move.

Anyone paying attention here knows these methods work, knows they work really well, knows they work consistently day after day through varying (bull, bear, trend, and range) market conditions, and knows they work using hard stops that never exceed minimum targets, so there's no cheating like averaging down or holding for weeks until price "comes back".

Atticus admitted he's here for entertainment purposes (and a few others have admitted that to me in the past via PM).

Surf admitted he's not really a trader, he's a writer.

It's been all good fun, but if I keep baiting these boys, the aspiring traders looking for valuable information might get confused, so I'll give it break :cool:
 
I guess maybe put this to rest.
And don't try to save the aspiring traders,
that's the save one thousand starfish on the beach teaching metaphor.
Trade for you and your family.
Quote from atticus:

I think it's the claim to make $100k on a $10k account in a year on 1 lot CL. I for one doubt that you went from 1 lots in ES in your journal in 2009 to doing 900% in CL.

It's in the "why do 5% of traders win?" thread.
 
Quote from NoDoji:

I posted daily in the P/L threads starting from when I was a rank beginner, July 2008, and continued posting into 2010.

I called trades live in ET's old chat room, then called trades in Robert Weinstein's chat room when ET's room went down, then called trades live in CL Redux and ES Journal, then spent 6 hours a day with other ET traders on Skype, developing my current trading methods and calling trades all day, then I've shared with quite a few ET-ers my trading methods via Skype since then.

Cornixforex, another professional retail technical price action trader, knows me from the 2008 ET chat days as well as 2010/2011 Skype sessions and if these TA methods didn't work, surely there would've been a stretch of time in all those different market conditions where the tactics failed. But so far they haven't failed, because they're based on price movement and the only way that fails is if liquidity dries up and price fails to move.

Anyone paying attention here knows these methods work, knows they work really well, knows they work consistently day after day through varying (bull, bear, trend, and range) market conditions, and knows they work using hard stops that never exceed minimum targets, so there's no cheating like averaging down or holding for weeks until price "comes back".

Atticus admitted he's here for entertainment purposes (and a few others have admitted that to me in the past via PM).

Surf admitted he's not really a trader, he's a writer.

It's been all good fun, but if I keep baiting these boys, the aspiring traders looking for valuable information might get confused, so I'll give it break :cool:


Wow, all this time for phony calls in chat rooms, but not enough time for proving it in the combine? What's the excuse now? Give it up nodoji. You been Pwned!
Phonycornix is welcome to the combine to prove these generic methods, but I bet excuses will arrive soon enough. What you teach is generic book knowledge, it doesn't work in the real markets. Simple as that. For I it did, you would have no issue doing the combine, nor would the rest of the TA brigade.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top