Surfer Alerts

[marketsurfer]

Quote from cornix:


BTW, I was ET member since early 2005 and was not attracted by "forex" here. Actually traded SIFs back then and do trade SIFs now too.

Please stop posting here. You registered on Jan, 2011 -- so unless you are a multi alias troll--- it wasnt' 2005--not to mention your very name included the term FOREX prior to it being dropped.


cornix

Registered: Jan 2011
Posts: 2827

Why not start your own thread, then you can talk about whatever you want? You like it here because you know I have a large (relative) readership base and you can use this thread in an attempt to attract some to whatever it is you are selling with the hyperbole. back on ignore, surf

 

[marketsurfer]

Quote from Lord.Maushi:

I won't quote Cornix but I will tell you my thoughts.

He adds value to your journal, has got the mark of a good sensible trader and I agree with everything he has said without even knowing the guy.

If you want a good journal, do not make things personal, you are radical in your beliefs, which will obviously produce arguments.

Just my humble opinion.

Thank you, but I disagree. If he has actual value add, i am certain his journal would be a success-- but apparently not since he is hanging onto mine even after I request no more posts. surf

 

[Samsara]

Quote from marketsurfer:

Thank you, but I disagree. If he has actual value add, i am certain his journal would be a success-- but apparently not since he is hanging onto mine even after I request no more posts. surf

Surf, you gotta realize by now though that people don't read your journal for your calls, right? It's the entertainment.

 

[marketsurfer]

Quote from Samsara:

Surf, you gotta realize by now though that people don't read your journal for your calls, right? It's the entertainment.

yeah, during my losing streaks I agree with you-- however, a series of winning calls seems to attract much more interest.

surf

 

[Samsara]

Quote from marketsurfer:

yeah, during my losing streaks I agree with you-- however, a series of winning calls seems to attract much more interest.

surf

Negative. Part of what you do is to just take contrary positions and defend them to the end. Not because you believe them, of course, but because it gets attention.

First it was that any historical data, whether displayed graphically or just by virtue of taking place "in the past" is useless. That is, until you revealed you've been making trading decisions the entire time using just that.

Now it's the use of stops, and an entire asset class (forex). Both of which are, of course, silly.

The key denominator here is just that people will disagree with you. To that end it works. Just run with it dude. All the flailing is hilarious.

 

[Cote Rotie]

Quote from marketsurfer:

yeah, during my losing streaks I agree with you-- however, a series of winning calls seems to attract much more interest.

surf

You are not consistent, and I personally would not follow any of your calls. I honestly find most of the value here by reading others posts.

 

[marketsurfer]

Quote from Cote Rotie:

You are not consistent, and I personally would not follow any of your calls. I honestly find most of the value here by reading others posts.

Truth --- is any real trader truly consistent? I would place the consistent number at less than 1% of all active traders. Obviously, I am not talkign about hindsight chart reading jockeys and their ridiculous claims-- but real traders over a decade or longer. surf

 

[sheda]

Management will soon be well aware of the stealth vendor, it takes awhile for them to catch on sometimes, untill then, I suggest everyone place the person on ignore, as I have done. This is just another example on how nothing good EVER comes from the folks first attracted here by Forex. Even I was fooled for awhile with this one. Once again, DO NOT POST on my thread stealth vendor.

I read your journal because your a pratt, which makes it funny. Whenever however whoever puts a well reasoned counter point to you, you instantly scream stealth vendor! instead of responding.

The person you are asking others to put down because you lack whats required to even respond out ranks you so much as far as value given to this forum is concerned its unreal. What do you actually do around here apart from ask do they trade from home, and other NOB questions.

 

[marketsurfer]

Quote from sheda:

I read your journal because your a pratt, which makes it funny. Whenever however whoever puts a well reasoned counter point to you, you instantly scream stealth vendor! instead of responding.

The person you are asking others to put down because you lack whats required to even respond out ranks you so much as far as value given to this forum is concerned its unreal. What do you actually do around here apart from ask do they trade from home, and other NOB questions.

Completely wrong. Are you talking for yourself or on behalf of the 51, 000 plus hits this journal has received within the last 2 months?

Regarding your point, I am not going to respond continusally to stealth vendors pumping their god like trading abilities that are so out of whack with reality to be simply silly. This thread is about trading reality and that includes losses. The phoneys can post some place else. If you read the journals since 2002, you will see that I am happy to admit when I am wrong. thank you, surf

PS-- by the way, what's a "pratt"? Google doesn;t seem to have any derogatory meanings of the word.

 

[zdreg]

Quote from marketsurfer:

Completely wrong. Are you talking for yourself or on behalf of the 51, 000 plus hits this journal has received within the last 2 months?

Regarding your point, I am not going to respond continusally to stealth vendors pumping their god like trading abilities that are so out of whack with reality to be simply silly. This thread is about trading reality and that includes losses. The phoneys can post some place else. thank you, surf

PS-- by the way, what's a "pratt"? Google doesn;t seem to have any derogatory meanings of the word.

does the 51,000 hits outweigh your recent thread about sykes which had to be removed from ET. that thread went to the core of your character, which had the usual information with the intention to deceive rather than to enlighten.