Supreme court upholds voter ID law, disenfranchising native Americans in ND
- Thread starter Cuddles
- Start date
Possibly. Are you retreating on your Medicare and Medicaid claim?
I got out and did my early voting yesterday in North Carolina.
I proudly voted Yes for a state constitutional amendment to require a Picture ID for voting.
I proudly voted Yes for a state constitutional amendment to require a Picture ID for voting.
Not at all. To get Medicaid and Medicare, you need to prove who you are, and that requires a form of acceptable photo ID.
And it's not "possibly". It's "definitely". No doctor allows you to show up and claim you are someone to get treated the first time. Period.
According to the Social Security website, here are the documents you may need when enrolling in Medicare only:
- Your birth certificate or other proof of birth
- Proof of United States citizenship or legal residency if not born in the US
- Your Social Security card if you are already receiving benefits
- Health insurance information about the type and dates of coverage
- Information about your employment, such as a W-2 form, if you are still working
- US military discharge papers if you served before 1968
Please tell me how you get by these requirements without some sort of photo ID being part of the process.
Last edited:
Can you believe that someone would be discriminated against by requiring an ID? ----It may be discriminatory against illegal voters.-- I am certainly in favor of that type of discrimination.
No one was turned away. That's all that matters. If 16,000 people didn't have acceptable ID, they could have gotten such if they had planned ahead of time. If you wait until the last minute, you have no one to blame but yourself.
In the reasons picked in your presented paper, none displayed acceptable evidence to not get an ID. The vast majority picked "other", as well.
What a fantastic video showing how completely and totally out of touch liberals are. Not one liberal on this board will watch it.
If any did watch it, it wouldn't compute and they'd simply spit out the "racist" PEZ.
We are back to the same failures as your last argument about needing id to purchase a gun. Perhaps you should spend more time thinking these things through.
I see. That is an excellent junior analysis. Perhaps you may want to re-read the analysis in the study. I don’t think your opinion is as well thought through.
You should stick to just complaining. I don’t think analytical debates based on facts is your strong suit.