Supreme Court to Overturn Roe v. Wade

[exGOPer]

Its sad that you need to stay ignorant to support your views

Most Republicans do want exemptions in cases of rape and incest...... 67%

View attachment 287574

AGAIN

Let me make it clear for you.

We are not talking about MOST REPUBLICANS, we are talking about REPUBLICANS who are in power in red states which is nearly half the states, they are not for any exemptions.

Second, Republicans in non-red states are for some exemptions for rape and incest but not in any other cases which means complete ban with government deciding who gets abortion and woman getting jailed if they choose to exercise the 'option'.

Funny you are accusing others of ignorance while completely ignoring the nuance here, what MOST Republicans want is not what the Republican leaders legislate.

 

[Mercor]

Lets be honest here, if you’re “pro-life” you can’t really make those exceptions. You’re pro-life in name only if you’re willing to allow any abortion that could be carried to term otherwise.

The only true “pro-life” stand on allowing some abortions is when the life of the mother is in danger or the fetus is not viable. Any Republican who thinks exceptions should be made for rape or incest isn’t “pro-life.”

Great point......Its called intellectual honesty
The right would say why should the baby pay the price of a crime....
OTH the left also needs to commit to full term abortions .

Thats why RBG and most legal people knew that ROE should not have been created from the 14th amendment......So for 50 years Roe was just a social compromise...that kinda worked

 

[Mercor]

AGAIN

Let me make it clear for you.

We are not talking about MOST REPUBLICANS, we are talking about REPUBLICANS who are in power in red states which is nearly half the states, they are not for any exemptions.

Second, Republicans in non-red states are for some exemptions for rape and incest but not in any other cases which means complete ban with government deciding who gets abortion and woman getting jailed if they choose to exercise the 'option'.

Funny you are accusing others of ignorance while completely ignoring the nuance here, what MOST Republicans want is not what the Republican leaders legislate.

No, You said Republicans as in all......
now to save your point you are narrowing it down to elected officials who don't believe in exceptions.......
Congratulations you found your target group.....unleash the hate

 

[UsualName]

Great point......The right would say why should the baby pay the price of a crime....
OTH the left also needs to commit to full term abortions .

Thats why RBG and most legal people knew that ROE should not have been created from the 14th amendment......So for 50 years Roe was just a social compromise...that kinda worked

Ohh please. Abortion was well fit as a right to privacy but make no mistake the Alito ruling declares nowhere in the constitution protects abortion. So your argument is moot. Trying to use Ginsberg as if this court would somehow reinstate choice if argued another way is just a lie.

 

[Ricter]

Most Republican in red states are opposed to any exemptions even in cases of rape and incest, not to forget even the 3 month windows is opposed by Republicans even in non Red states, so not sure what you are on about.

He's on about trolling. That's all Mercor is about anymore.

 

[exGOPer]

No, You said Republicans as in all......
now to save your point you are narrowing it down to elected officials who don't believe in exceptions.......
Congratulations you found your target group.....unleash the hate

First, I was quoting an article, I didn't say "ALL" or anything like that.

Second, you are quoting a poll without providing a source, could be a push poll you are supposedly against.

Third, many are opposed to late term abortions but since you have not made it clear under what conditions people oppose abortions, you can easily include that as a justification when most support it early in the pregnancy.

Congratulations for trying to derail the topic, too bad you failed.

 

[exGOPer]

He's on about trolling. That's all Mercor is about anymore.

Texas Gov. Abbott Still Refuses To Add Rape And Incest Exemptions To Abortion Law

Referencing the fact the law forbids abortion after six weeks, Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace asked whether it's "reasonable" to tell a rape victim who didn't realize they were pregnant in time to legally get an abortion — "Well, don't worry about it, because we're going to eliminate rape as a problem."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alison...t-exemptions-to-abortion-law/?sh=c64086c3142d

Ya, some trying to play dumb

 

[Mercor]

Ohh please. Abortion was well fit as a right to privacy but make no mistake the Alito ruling declares nowhere in the constitution protects abortion. So your argument is moot. Trying to use Ginsberg as if this court would somehow reinstate choice if argued another way is just a lie.

ok
I respect your view....It will be a question for the States to decide now

 

[Mercor]

First, I was quoting an article, I didn't say "ALL" or anything like that.

Second, you are quoting a poll without providing a source, could be a push poll you are supposedly against.

Third, many are opposed to late term abortions but since you have not made it clear under what conditions people oppose abortions, you can easily include that as a justification when most support it early in the pregnancy.

Congratulations for trying to derail the topic, too bad you failed.

First, I was quoting an article, I didn't say "ALL" or anything like that.
It said Republicans, meaning all....implied

Second, you are quoting a poll without providing a source, could be a push poll you are supposedly against.
The graph says Gallop.....do you even read the details

 

[Mercor]

He's on about trolling. That's all Mercor is about anymore.

You post is vacant