Supreme Court to Overturn Roe v. Wade

[UsualName]

public funding for private/religious schools is a tricky subject.

In general many religious schools get funding from the Church (if Catholic and they are rich) as well as from parents in the form of tuition PLUS annual fundraising galas. This also leads to better pay for staff. Things public schools certainly go without. Private schools, at least in my area, charge almost a college tuition and still fundraise.

Why should they get taxpayer funds if the exclusively restrict who can go there and have numerous sources of money to tap into?

On the other side they often meet state requirements for education and perhaps they request funding for special programs that all public schools participate in and want to be on the same footing since their kids are often meeting or exceeding state requirements.

It is a tough call but I think a State is valid in denying any public funds to private or religious schools across the board. HOWEVER... and here is the problem, if they allow public funds to private schools then excluding religious schools becomes difficult to support since you already crossed the hard and fast line between public and private. That is where states get into trouble.

Im guessing you’re in a civilized part of the country but start thinking Deep South and isolated Midwest, where “churches” are the power base of entire communities, towns and even counties. It has been a goal of many of these “churches” to get the public education funding.

Many people are looking at this from a Muslim, Catholic, Jewish school type of thing but you have to take a closer look at the people funding the suits. This is more coming from corporate churches seeking a power grab than Rabbis and Priests trying to keep the doors open.

 

[UsualName]

You would think lefties would be excited about roe overturn.

It ups the odds that red states may turn blue with part of female vote swinging
the other way because they want to safely eject their babies.

Your mistake is that you are assuming people think like you, and by that in political terms rather than actual impact on society.

For example, many union workers vote Republican while republicans continuously appoint judges that will rule to undermine worker’s rights and unions. These union workers are making a fatal error in looking at this stuff in terms of a political view rather than impact.

 

[El OchoCinco]

Im guessing you’re in a civilized part of the country but start thinking Deep South and isolated Midwest, where “churches” are the power base of entire communities, towns and even counties. It has been a goal of many of these “churches” to get the public education funding.

Many people are looking at this from a Muslim, Catholic, Jewish school type of thing but you have to take a closer look at the people funding the suits. This is more coming from corporate churches than Rabbis and Priests.

That is why states should just put a thick wall between public and private schools and not mix funding at all....but state legislatures are not that smart.

 

[Mercor]

In a way after Roe is gone segments of abortion will be available for the first time
Under Roe it is virtually impossible to have a 9th month abortion by choice
Now many states will allow abortion up until birth. Virginia at one time was proposing a post birth abortion.

 

[FortuneTeller]

You wound think right-wing extremists would be excited to support Roe vs. Wade -- considering abortion disproportionately reduces the number of dark-skinned people in the U.S. --- something they seem to heartily applaud in general.

Right wing people have empathy towards little unborn children, something the Left does not.

 

[Ricter]

Right wing people have empathy towards little unborn children, something the Left does not.

This is why you collect your sperm in your socks.

 

[gwb-trading]

Right wing people have empathy towards little unborn children, something the Left does not.

Sometimes George Carlin says it best...

 

[UsualName]

Got to get through this for details but it means more guns, except for in the Supreme Court, or an NRA convention, or a Trump event of course but for us plebeians it’s guns everywhere…

As if we needed it, life in America is about to get more dangerous.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1539979772473839620

 

[El OchoCinco]

Got to get through this for details but it means more guns, except for in the Supreme Court, or an NRA convention, or a Trump event of course but for us plebeians it’s guns everywhere…

As if we needed it, life in America is about to get more dangerous.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1539979772473839620

A show proper cause to get a gun permit legally is a bit of an overreach from the State and court was correct to strike this down. First of all, a concelaed carry is for outside your house. Inside your house why would you need a concealed carry??

Second, obviosuly the law implies that it is legal to conceal carry with a license. Then how does the law add in some arbitrary proper cause requirement which means the right to a concealed carry already established is now contingent upon some arbitrary and capricious decision of a court without due process.

THe 2nd Amendment for legal gun carriers with a permit and background check does not require people to justify why they want to exercise their constitutional right. Imagine applying for a valid permit to host a rally legally and the issuer asks for you to prove your rally is really necessary??

 

[UsualName]

A show proper cause to get a gun permit legally is a bit of an overreach from the State and court was correct to strike this down. First of all, a concelaed carry is for outside your house. Inside your house why would you need a concealed carry??

Second, obviosuly the law implies that it is legal to conceal carry with a license. Then how does the law add in some arbitrary proper cause requirement which means the right to a concealed carry already established is now contingent upon some arbitrary and capricious decision of a court without due process.

THe 2nd Amendment for legal gun carriers with a permit and background check does not require people to justify why they want to exercise their constitutional right. Imagine applying for a valid permit to host a rally legally and the issuer asks for you to prove your rally is really necessary??

Youre tripping. There’s going to be hundreds of thousands of people who conceal carry now in my state. Basic things like Shopping at Target is about to change.

This is a foolish decision that overturns established laws that have been on the books for over 100 years.