I don't recall personally saying that govt spending costs jobs. If u just change the first one to "govt spending costs (taxpayers) money!" then they are both true. Govt jobs are a drain on the economy.. the fewer the better. I would ideally not cut back on the military while there are so many other worthless jobs in govt to cut instead.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Supreme Court justices warn budget cuts âputting public safety at riskâ
- Thread starter AK Forty Seven
- Start date
I don't recall personally saying that govt spending costs jobs. If u just change the first one to "govt spending costs (taxpayers) money!" then they are both true. Govt jobs are a drain on the economy.. the fewer the better. I would ideally not cut back on the military while there are so many other worthless jobs in govt to cut instead.
Quote from Ricter:
You have got to be kidding. Reading comprehension? The justices are talking about court operations and possible outcomes therein from sequestration, not "economics". I think they're fully qualified to describe what goes on in courtrooms (and to some extent throughout the criminal justice system).
The Supreme court is conspiciously silent on Barry not passing a budget in years..
Please post a quote published in the media from anytime in the last 50 years a Supreme court justice comments on budget.
Quote from Ricter:
The justices are talking about court operations and possible outcomes therein from sequestration,
Well sequestration was Barry's idea in the first place, why didn't they speak up when he proposed it?
Times must be bad. At any rate. I think it's beneath a Supreme court judge to bitch about peeling paint. We have systems in place for maintenance and that doesn't include these guys going to the media and bitch about Congress.