Supply-Side economics. Why?

it hasn't done anything but centralize.... Trump is a centralist... explain how you believe we are decentralizing... more power to the states and less federal bueros , i don't see that happening
Oh, I'm sorry I misunderstood what you meant by "centralist". I thought you were referring to politics. I should read more carefully.

Possibly a period of exception to your centralization trend would be the 1980s in the U.S. and Great Britain; a period of rediscovering economic and political freedom. The successes of that period were mixed of course with some spectacular failures.
 
Last edited:
Oh yes. It is a well known graph. I too have it in my texts. Economic "theories," which are mostly hypotheses rather than theories, depend on assumptions. The problem for economists is that their assumptions often prove to be wrong. Here is one of my favorite examples. When there is hyperinflation economists assume wages will be spent immediately; when there is deflation economists assume wages will be saved until prices are lower. The first assumption holds well, the second does not hold, with the exception of high cost, capital equipment for which purchase is often delayed when their is deflation. The reason the second assumption does not hold with regard to wages is that it runs into two hurdles: one is human nature which favors gratification now; the other is general economic conditions that usually accompany deflation. Economists haven't figured out how to get people to read economic textbooks so they will know how they are supposed to behave.


I could never get past assumptions made in the first week like people are always rational actors. Hence, I didn't major in it.
 
My only recommendation is to read some Austrian economic theory. It is the best to me in describing credit cycles.. and it is a study of human action.. not some quantative study of inference which like many have said doesn't work so well
 
Back
Top