I didn't even get to your spelling or grammar. I was only referring to your sentence structure, which didn't quite meet elementary school standards.Quote from Lucrum:
Busted again by our Royal Mounted Canadian grammar/spelling police.
As he rides to the rescue of spelling and grammar sitting atop his high horse.
![]()
Quote from Brass:
I didn't even get to your spelling or grammar. I was only referring to your sentence structure, which didn't quite meet elementary school standards.
Thanks for ruining this thread, although I can't say I didn't help.
http://www.putlearningfirst.com/language/06senten/06senten.htmlQuote from fhl:
Sentence structure isn't part of grammar up in Canada, eh?
:eek:
Quote from Brass:
http://www.putlearningfirst.com/language/06senten/06senten.html
A sentence can be grammatically correct but awkwardly written. If you can't make the distinction then try to stay within your depth.
Interesting alternative. Thanks for the link. But I note that the technology is still "window in window" when activated, which is what Superfocus tries to get away from. Fortunately, I'm still not at the point where I need either of these, as they hammer out who's who.