I'm curious if anyone here has tried them. And, if so, what's your verdict?
http://www.superfocus.com/
http://www.superfocus.com/
Quote from Brass:
I'm curious if anyone here has tried them. And, if so, what's your verdict?
http://www.superfocus.com/

I've forgotten more about economics than you'll ever know. Now go ahead, and use that remark against me because you don't understand the context. Won't be the first time.Quote from Lucrum:
Maybe you should get a pair, and then read a real economics book.![]()
If I'm not mistaken, you actually need a prescription for the outer lens for distance. However, the inner lens can be adjusted for all else. In any event, I live in Montreal, and the closest dispenser is in Toronto, about 350 miles away. Perhaps on my next visit there. Meanwhile, they have more dispensing practioners in the US, so you first.Quote from trendo:
Can you go to one of the dispensing practitioners listed on their website? Try on a pair and let us know if you like them. I don't have any experience with them, but they do look like an interesting concept.

Why would you? When was the last time you read anything longer than a P&R post?Quote from Lucrum:
Well at least this much is true. I'll be 51 in less than two weeks and I still don't need reading glasses/bifocals...LOL
I'm reading/studying a 450 page manual on a aircraft I'll be type rated in next month right now.Quote from Brass:
Why would you? When was the last time you read anything longer than a P&R post?![]()
That sure is a lot of useless gibberish when you could have merely admitted that yes you need reading glasses.As it happens, I presently only need glasses for distance. However, I have noticed that the very smallest print on vitamin bottles and such is getting a tad smaller and fuzzier. Either that or my arms are getting shorter. Only bottles, though, for some reason. Not boxes. Go figure.