trading is not about always being right
heck, many traders make good money only being right (trade hitting a target before a stop) 30% of the time.
regardlss, of trader methodology (scalper, position player, whatever), traders make money when they make trades with a positive expectancy. - is the risk well defined, is their compelling risk/reward, etc.
we had a 10% drop in the vix today. VIX got down to mid 18's!!!
this should tell you something. options traders are not putting a premium (pun intended ) on risk.
imo, the most compelling trade today was to go long volatility. you don't have to be RIGHT. but volatility has contracted so much that the risk/reward is phenomenally compelling. last time i saw a similar situation, i got some DIA puts that gave me 20-45 % return in a # of days ( i scale out of winning positions generally). that's a compelling trade, when the risk is (getting a fair amount of time in the puts) relatively small to the downside
imo (and that's not a what i want to see opinion, but a statistically based opinion), puts were a frigging STEAL today- specifically mar 2008 puts.
you can sit on them for a few weeks and lose little time premium, with the potential for volatility expansion or even one nasty 200-500 pt selloff making this quite a compelling trade.
but was it a "sucker's rally?"
NOBODY knows. it was a big gap, that barely retraced and ran mostly into the close. whether it balances at this new area, retraces, or continues upwards - NOBODY knows and anybody who tells you they do know is lying or deluded
heck, many traders make good money only being right (trade hitting a target before a stop) 30% of the time.
regardlss, of trader methodology (scalper, position player, whatever), traders make money when they make trades with a positive expectancy. - is the risk well defined, is their compelling risk/reward, etc.
we had a 10% drop in the vix today. VIX got down to mid 18's!!!
this should tell you something. options traders are not putting a premium (pun intended ) on risk.
imo, the most compelling trade today was to go long volatility. you don't have to be RIGHT. but volatility has contracted so much that the risk/reward is phenomenally compelling. last time i saw a similar situation, i got some DIA puts that gave me 20-45 % return in a # of days ( i scale out of winning positions generally). that's a compelling trade, when the risk is (getting a fair amount of time in the puts) relatively small to the downside
imo (and that's not a what i want to see opinion, but a statistically based opinion), puts were a frigging STEAL today- specifically mar 2008 puts.
you can sit on them for a few weeks and lose little time premium, with the potential for volatility expansion or even one nasty 200-500 pt selloff making this quite a compelling trade.
but was it a "sucker's rally?"
NOBODY knows. it was a big gap, that barely retraced and ran mostly into the close. whether it balances at this new area, retraces, or continues upwards - NOBODY knows and anybody who tells you they do know is lying or deluded