Quote from RedDuke:
Do you mind explaining it? For example why are euro stox or dax bullshit contracts?
Quote from $preader:
Don't mind at all.
Any contracts that can offer the opportunity for some French guy to buy so many undetected then cause the almost worldwide meltdown of the Stock Markets and a panic rate-cut by the Fed are total bullshit.
Notice you didn't even bother to defend Bund,Bobl or Schatz but to be honest I don't see how anyone could,I mean,what sort of a contract runs a 170 tick stop/market order with combination of stops for absolutely no reason.
Quote from RedDuke:
Still not following why it is bullshit. I never traded bonds so that is why I did not mention them.
I day trade DAX, and used to trade euro stoxx a while back. I find DAX to be a great contract. So Eurex let SocGen guy buy a lot, do not see why this is such a problem. It could have happened on almost any exchange, unless there is a a limit of how much open interests one institution can hold, but it would not be bullet proof either.
As far as 170 tick run, I am sure there was a reason, though it might not be visible to people like us.
Quote from $preader:
I'm assuming by saying you used to trade ESX a while back you mean you now don't,so I'm further assuming it didn't become worth it financially to continue in there otherwise you'd still be trading it.This is what I find common with the contracts they offer,people keep changing from one to the other thinking they've finally found the one for them until it dawns on them that it isn't.
With regards to saying the SocGen affair could have happened on any Exchange,this is hypothetical,the facts are that it did happen on Eurex,specifically in ESX and DAX,and saying you don't see a problem is bizarre.
The reason for the 170 tick run is simple,somebody made a right fuck-up on the mouse.That is why it recovered straight away to the levels before the order and then squeezed.They no way meant to do it.I imagine they tried to get the trades busted.
And it's all these sorts of things that are putting people off,which was why I posted on this thread about low volumes,a 10,000 lot spoofer in the Schatz who has caused someone to complain on just about every trading forum,hundreds of programmes which they actively encourage,no locals wanted the Bobl half-tick but they did it anyway and now it really is a joke contract,I mean NFP day and it can't even do half a million lots.
If you like trading Eurex products then fine,I'm always pleased to hear if someone can trade any contracts and do well but please don't try and sweep these issues under the carpet like they're not important.
Quote from $preader:
I'm assuming by saying you used to trade ESX a while back you mean you now don't,so I'm further assuming it didn't become worth it financially to continue in there otherwise you'd still be trading it.This is what I find common with the contracts they offer,people keep changing from one to the other thinking they've finally found the one for them until it dawns on them that it isn't.
With regards to saying the SocGen affair could have happened on any Exchange,this is hypothetical,the facts are that it did happen on Eurex,specifically in ESX and DAX,and saying you don't see a problem is bizarre.
The reason for the 170 tick run is simple,somebody made a right fuck-up on the mouse.That is why it recovered straight away to the levels before the order and then squeezed.They no way meant to do it.I imagine they tried to get the trades busted.
And it's all these sorts of things that are putting people off,which was why I posted on this thread about low volumes,a 10,000 lot spoofer in the Schatz who has caused someone to complain on just about every trading forum,hundreds of programmes which they actively encourage,no locals wanted the Bobl half-tick but they did it anyway and now it really is a joke contract,I mean NFP day and it can't even do half a million lots.
If you like trading Eurex products then fine,I'm always pleased to hear if someone can trade any contracts and do well but please don't try and sweep these issues under the carpet like they're not important.
!! I'm in this market to make money ... not validate the quality of the contract. If I was into trading quality, I would trade exotic cars...hmmm... sounds like a fun idea if I make enough money off these Bull$#!T contracts. Quote from RedDuke:
Wasn't 1/2 tick reduction on Schatz done to combat flipper - Paul Rotter? At least, this is the rumor I have heard.