Quote from gmst:
What I don't have is rock solid discipline. On Thursday after losing and then winning a trade in ES, I should have stopped as I had no other setup. But I went on to have 16 more trades, paying 4.02 commissions every round trip. that is 64$ right there.
.

Quote from gmst:
What I don't have is rock solid discipline. On Thursday after losing and then winning a trade in ES, I should have stopped as I had no other setup. But I went on to have 16 more trades, paying 4.02 commissions every round trip. that is 64$ right there. I also managed to lose a bit more money on those trades. That is why I am reporting number of unplanned trades every week. I never kept any records for this stat before, and as things stand now, this is one of the most important stat that will help me keep my balance and perspective and help me achieve my goal. Thanks for your critique though.
Quote from gmst:
Basically had gone long after 90 pip gapup on AUD on Monday and long Euro also.
Quote from gmst:
Went berserk on Thursday when I had 16 unplanned trades, lost some dollars there.
8. # of Trades other than Systematic Trades: 16
Quote from gmst:
6. # of winning days 40%, # of losing days 60%
Quote from Laissez Faire:
Good luck with your return to trading and your new journal.
As you have already experienced, you attract a lot of negativity and criticism that is not always constructive when having a public journal on ET.
I would advice you to question the benefit of having a public journal and whether it adds or takes from your trading. Is it because you want to show people that you can do it? Or because you think this public journal will help your trading?
Earlier you mentioned that you were consistently losing in the ES market, but was consistently winning in the currency market. Why do you insist on day trading the ES then? Did you improve there as well?
Personally, I think ES is a poor market to choose if you are looking for a contract to day trade exclusively, unless you are in a position where you need the liquidity and really know what you`re doing. Until you get there, consistently more volatile markets may be a better bet. One possible solution would be to trade two markets, such that you have an alternative on those tight range days that happens frequently in the ES.
Happy holidays!![]()

Quote from Zen Student:
That shows you don't understand the cycles in either market. Euro was weak and you should not have been buying there...AUD is ready to buy bigger picture but needed another test of the lows and you got caught in a sucker gap. You do not want to be chasing the market and entering at very unfavourable prices. To achieve your goals precision is required on every entry.
If unplanned = unsignalled you are doing something badly wrong. Why allow yourself 16...why not stop at the earliest indication that you had started to deviate from your strategy?
Back to the drawing board for you. A bad session due human error or unanticipated factors can happen, however as many as two losing sessions is an indication you do not know sufficiently what you are doing.
Work out why you are losing and don't trade until you have the answers. Make the most of the long weekend working 15 hours a day on strategy.
Quote from logic_man:
So you make 8 unplanned trades for every planned trade? Is this typical? Even 1 unplanned trade for every planned trade is a recipe for disaster since, I assume, the reason the trades are unplanned is because you don't have a strategy for managing them once they are entered and you are just "winging it".
Might I suggest you look at a couple of different approaches to trading because I think they will help you develop a "system" mentality. The first would be Elliott Wave. Notice how the wave theory attempts to classify ALL market action as being part of a larger context, forcing the trader into generating specific hypotheses for what the market should do next and reacting if it does or doesn't. The second is the ACD Method, which is the subject of a great thread right here on ET. This also will provide you with a broader overall context for market movements.
I'm not saying to adopt either of them (and definitely don't listen to any of the E-wave 'gurus' out there because they are all terrible market timers, but the theory can help you develop a certain set of habits of mind), but any system you want to work with long-term should have a similar "feel" to both E-wave and ACD, i.e. it should be "all-encompassing" such that little or nothing is left to chance in the course of executing your trades day to day.
I have one set-up pattern with 9 precisely-defined variations (each with 6 sub-variations) and 1 "wildcard" pattern, i.e. the "pattern" which doesn't fit any of the other variations. Between these 55 different structures, every tick of the ES can be accounted for and I can look at any ES chart and say whether the position should be long, short or flat, where the current exit should be and what it would take to open a position in the opposite direction. The entire thing is "mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive". I would say that, if you want to really be a systematic trader, you would need to do something similar. Then, discipline will become second nature because you will know from experience which parts of your "mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive" strategy provide positive expectancy and which don't. Right now, it seems like you have a number of disparate set-ups, but no overarching theme to unite them.
If this is true then you have severely limited your context and will be playing most days as if they are the same when they are not. This is the root of many hit or miss approaches to the market; treating what appears to be similar on the surface as the same condition, when it is not the same condition. Following from this, "setups" which work until they don't, which is insufficiently accurate.Quote from gmst:
I haven't done any analysis of cycles in markets. Most of my trading is around intraday setups.
What has changed? Why will you act differently in the future? What have you put in place mentally to achieve this outcome? Stated differently, I am sure you have made such commitments before but ended up repeating old mistakes. What have you realised this time which allows you to break the cycle? This will be very helpful for other aspiring traders with similar difficulties to learn.Quote from gmst:
Why allow yourself 16 - This has been a problem for a few months, but I have overcome this problem to a large extent now. I am confident I won't do such a thing ever again in future.[/B]
My personal take on the above: you get out of this business what you are prepared to put in. You'll do better than 40% win rate playing roulette. Why you think it is "not that bad" to be incorrect on over half your trades is beyond me. Why would you expect improvement when you already feel you are good enough and that how hard you think you have worked is justification for taking it easy?Quote from gmst:
Actually, I plan to take it easy the weekend. Having worked my ass off for last 1 year, now as I have finally got a plan, its time to just let the damn thing cruise. BTW, 40% win rate is not bad considering my win:loss ratio. With time this win rate will improve. [/B]
Btw, I won't cheat on my stats.