Success in life and in Trading

I don't see how that is possible with a 1:1 RR and a fixed daily goal.

2:1 or 3:1 or 5:1 RR are better goals for each trade. Then you can get away with a win rate of below 50%.

High win rates are very hard to achieve because most price movements are very noisy. But every now and then the market moves bigly.

But still everyone wants high win rates.
 
Last edited:
I don't see how that is possible with a 1:1 RR and a fixed daily goal.
Hello Overnight,

Whats up good buddy.

You nailed it buddy. You nailed. Risk = Reward, and a fixed daily goal of $100. I have learned over time, simplicity is freedom. Simplicity is wise. Wanting more comes with stress. Contentment is trumps everything.

Full Disclaimer: I am ONLY a consistent profitable trader for 2 months now. Please see my comments as my opinions only. I have zero proof of anything I say longer than 2 months. My comments are probably worth a penny with a hole in it or the dog poop at the dog park.
 
Everyone...has an inspiring ....story or moment.
Walking to the mailbox....can be described as incredibly profound, given the right circumstances and dramatic, script, writing.

And before you know it, this walking to the mailbox story....is being mentioned across social media -- inspiring people, by walking to the mailbox. And it has parallels to every other aspect of someone's life.

Your walking to the mailbox story.....made me the trader, and human being,....I am today,
And this incredibly story....will be magically replaced next week....with someone's driving to the supermarket story,
The week after....I had this profound moment while pumping gas, that forever changed my life and outlook,

Another person will share something on social media....that says....eating two Big Macs a week, inside of a McDonald's....did this to me, and changed me so much in more ways than one,

Thoughts 2022,
Have you achieved so little that the best you can do is belittle everything in your reach? Sad little man you are.
 
2:1 or 3:1 or 5:1 RR are better goals for each trade. Then you can get away with a win rate of below 50%.

High win rates are very hard to achieve because most price movements are very noisy. But every now and then the market moves bigly.

But still everyone wants high win rates.

In my humble experience, a higher RR does not = a better strategy on its own. Higher RR is simply offset by lower probability of turning into a profit, that's all.
 
That's too bad, I was rooting for you.
100 bucks a day seems pretty tame compared to your million dollar goal.
They say a mans reach should exceed his grasp or something like that. Don't make life too easy on yourself. How the hell you going to live on 100 bucks a day?
"They" must not of the Tolstoy short story of "How much land does a man need?"
 
In my humble experience, a higher RR does not = a better strategy on its own. Higher RR is simply offset by lower probability of turning into a profit, that's all.

1:1 RR and a 65% win rate. And around one trade per day.

Is a holy grail trading system.

If i had that system for any liquid market I would be a very happy man.

That system has as Kelly optimal bet fraction of 30%, that is how good it is. Will make you rich very quick even betting at half Kelly.

Sadly such systems don't exist, or at least i haven't been able to find anything that consistently good..
 
Last edited:
1:1 RR and a 65% win rate. And around one trade per day.

Is almost a holy grail trading system.

If i had that system for any liquid market I would be a very happy man.

That system has as Kelly optimal bet fraction of 30%, that is how good it is. Will make you rich very quick even betting at half Kelly.

Sadly such systems don't exist, or at least i haven't been able to find anything that consistently good..

My point was rather that, blindly having higher RR does not make your strategy better.

If you have a 1:1 RR and win 6 times out of 10, then having a 1:2 RR will net you no more than 3 wins per 10 with the same strategy. There's no edge in simply lifting RR.

There IS edge, however, in higher RR but in a completely different manner. It's about knowing WHEN it makes sense to have higher RR and when it makes sense to have a lower one.
 
Back
Top